• delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Is not “we have most if the world’s wealth, we’re aware that 25% of our populationvm can’t find the biggest ocean in the world in a map, and we also won’t allocate funds to schools to fix this” a sign of low intelligence?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      No, it’s a sign of greedy people wanting to keep a population ignorant.

      Ignorance is not the same as unintelligence. To use the example I gave elsewhere, an indigenous Amazonian couldn’t find the Pacific Ocean on a map either. That doesn’t mean they’re stupid, and they’re far more likely to survive long-term in the Amazon than people the West regard as geniuses.

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Yes. We cannot measure intelligence. We can only measure culturally-relevant knowledge

        Generally, its in the interest of a country to have knowledgeable people. Its an investment that pays back well in $$$

        Qualitatively, I argue that a country that doesn’t allocate funds to make their population knowledgeable is not an intelligent country, regardless od what knowledge they try to teach (be it the three sisters or geography or mathematics or whatever)

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I agree. Hence my comment about the American educational system being broken. It hasn’t been invested in for a long time.

          But that doesn’t mean that Americans are, on average, less intelligent. It means that the system failed them.