USD “per year” prices:
The Essential plan is increasing from $60 to $80.
Extra increasing from $100 to $135.
Premium increasing from $120 to $160.

  • if I had the 2k for a gaming PC, that would almost last a console generation

    I paid ~$850 total for my rig, in 2018, and it’s still going strong. Might not have RTX, but from what I’ve seen on my PS5, not only do games barely use RTX, very few of those that do use it in a way that makes a visual difference.

    • technologicalcaveman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I built my pc about 3 months ago and paid the same. Amd 6700xt graphics card and ryzen 5 5600 X cpu, so it’s not a slouch by any means. Hell I just compiled gentoo and installed baldurs gate 3 in an evening, that’s pretty fuckin good. Sure, you pay around 1k for the PC. But you also get a computer that can be used for more than just gaming. I work on my computer and play games, plus the cost for upgrades will be much smaller compared to getting a whole new console. I’d say no matter what it’s worth it to get into pc gaming or just using a PC in general.

    • JelloBrains@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What would you say is the minimum GPU to get if you wanted it to last say 4-5 years, obviously knowing over time you’ll need to use a lower setting?

      • You could get literally any current generation card, or even a previous gen card, and not only will it last 4-5 years, you probably won’t even have to lower settings over time. Big leaps in graphics aren’t happening like they used to. The only new tech that came out between getting my GPU and now is raytracing. Pretty much every brand new game still defaults to Ultra settings, and I get pretty and high fps in everything I can throw at it, save for a few games that perform horribly on everything (like ARMA 3).

        • BudgieMania@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Gotta agree at least to a degree, in the current market 4-5 years feels less ambitious than in the past, at least in terms of staying within official minimum requirements. Elden Ring released in 2022 with a minimum requirement of an NVidia 1060… That card released around 2016.

          4-5 years puts you at the end of the gen, there’s no way something like a used 6700XT doesn’t stay within minimums for that period (it’s probably overshooting it by quite a bit) and it leaves you like 500 bucks for the rest of the computer in that example 850 budget, which is more than enough. It can be done.

    • Ganondorf@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      PC bros jerking off to 120 FPS, etc drive me nuts. If you play games just to compete over frames per second and not to enjoy games what are you doing? I’ve had multiple convos with PC nuts who said nothing about the game they were playing, just talked about how their rig was handling it.

      Dude/dudette, I’m playing on a Switch. I don’t care lol

      • discodoubloon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t give a care about anything over 60 unless I’m playing competitive shooters and at that point my graphics are at a minimum. A 1070ti was killing it for me at 1440p 144hz in Apex and even Cyberpunk was running pretty clean.

        It’s a pure luxury to get anything over 60 in modern single player games. Tears of the Kingdom does have frame drops, but the gameplay is so good I don’t care.

      • squid
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I find solus in that my PC is a PC first and a gaming power house second, also I don’t pay extra to get online