48-page report urges FTC, FCC to investigate connected TV industry data harvesting.

The companies behind the streaming industry, including smart TV and streaming stick manufacturers and streaming service providers, have developed a “surveillance system” that has “long undermined privacy and consumer protection,” according to a report from the Center for Digital Democracy (CDD) published today and sent to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Unprecedented tracking techniques aimed at pleasing advertisers have resulted in connected TVs (CTVs) being a “privacy nightmare,” according to Jeffrey Chester, report co-author and CDD executive director, resulting in calls for stronger regulation.

  • becausechemistry@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    One even worse thing about smart tv’s - they come with a bunch of free “channels” you can watch. If you have streaming services or cable, who cares?

    Except the people that don’t – rural folk who never would pay for cable – gobble it up. And it’s all right wing propaganda garbage. From Fox News to Newsmax, they’ve got every kind of anxiety-inducing conspiracy-laden “news” you can watch.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      There’s some good free stuff out there. PBS Kids for example. But yeah that doesn’t negate the harm from the deluge of conservative rag media.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m honestly surprised there isn’t some successful startup that markets itself as the “dumb TV company” by now. You can buy dumb TVs if you go out of your way to look, but if you knew there was the FutureCo DumbTV Plus or whatever out there and you didn’t have to do a bunch of searching…

    • CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because selling the data your SmartTV collects, is a massive revenue stream for these companies. Selling only dumb TVs wouldn’t be as profitable as a SmartTV would be.

      Also the ad space that could be projected to these, based on collected data is another massive revenue stream.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I recently purchased a new computer monitor; an LG Ultragear OLED. It’s as dumb as a bag of rocks - which is why I bought it.

    And let me tell you: it’s quite the search to find a monitor that DOESN’T have smart bullshit features built in. Most of them are now set up as if they were a TV first instead of a monitor - as in, you need to go deep into menus to find actual monitor settings.

    I’m glad I was able to find a dumb monitor, but I fear it might not be possible anymore when this needs replacement…

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I have seen that Dell has some huge monitors, might be worth looking into

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Not enough people are talking about the SFC v. Visio case currently being heard in California. Depending on the outcome of the case (and it’s looking fairly good for the Software Freedom Conservancy, not to get anyone’s hopes up), we might have fully-FOSS distros for existing consumer smart TVs sometime in the somewhat-not-too-distant future. Like we have OpenWRT and dd-wrt for routers and Graphine and LineageOS for smartphones. And there are potential implications for other types of consumer hardware devices.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That’s a good thing, but Smart TVs should only be a limited option in the first place. Most people do not need them or like them.

      I shouldn’t have to understand how to install a different OS on a TV in order to take the useless “smart” features away.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      This is awful, but our non-dumb TV (we have two TVs) is so damn slow to start and switch over that if we know we’re going to watch something on it the next day, we just don’t turn it off.

      But that one gets a lot less use, so it’s not left on all the time at least.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Now I’m confused. I do have the actual PC plugged in to the TV. Isn’t that what you were suggesting?

            I have a Lenovo M700 running LibreElec (just enough OS to run Kodi), which passes a HDMI signal to my surround sound receiver.

            When you turn on the TV, it takes about 2 minutes for android to boot up. Then you have to switch it across to HDMI input so you can see the signal from the M700 / Kodi.

            Kodi is pretty great and I do like it. The reason my wife doesn’t like this set up is because she likes to watch things on youtube and just let the algorithm choose what to watch next (I know right). You can watch youtube from Kodi, I even scrape youtube channels to my home server for the things my kids watch, but it just doesn’t work in this “let the algo feed me more” kind of way.

  • ihatetheworld@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I just wish there are options. I love to have one of those newer LG OLED without all the smart capabilities & additional hardware. Just a good screen that I can hook up to my PC and direct play all my shows and let the GPU handle all the necessary upscaling/tone mapping.