• idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Of course we were affected. The last year I lived in Connecticut, I paid $13k for healthcare, as a mostly healthy person in my 20s.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      You would have paid the same with Univeral Healthcare, but if you worked f9r a Connecticut insurance com0any you’d be out of work.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Other countries with universal healthcare don’t pay nearly as much as Americans do and not every industry needs to be saved. Health insurance companies are not even the biggest insurance employer in Connecticut, the vast majority of people in Connecticut had a net loss in not getting single payer through.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          A lot of other countries own their entire health care structure. Hospitals, the whole lot. That isn’t part of Universal health care and is the big component to lower costs overall.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Some, but a lot don’t. Even if that was the only way to reduce healthcare costs, it would be a great application for eminent domain. Luckily, everyone else has a better solution than ours.

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              The US is a big country in size and population. So, efforts in this area aren’t easy and very expensive. If you maintain everyone to have insurance, as with the ACA, you can lower about 1/3 of health care costs. Move to Universal Care, you’re looking at almost 2/3. Nationalize the entire Healthcare structure and you’ll see almost 3/3. I don’t really see that last one happening in my lifetime. It took a lot to convince people the ACA was good for them.

              • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                So we agree that Joe Lieberman voted against the interests of his constituents (the difference between the 1/3 and 2/3 of savings).

                • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I agree that Joe was listening to those constituents who wanted to keep their jobs. And, if the public would have given democrats more of a majority in the Senate he wouldn’t have been an issue.

                  • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    13 hours ago

                    So 25k people vs 3 million? That’s not called listening to your constituents. He had been a democrat until a few years before this and broke ranks because of the Iraq war, so his disagreement on this issue came as a surprise to many Connecticut voters.