Would it make the internet better? Probably.

  • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Not neccessarily. A spun off YouTube would still have YouTube premium and ad revenue. They could also sell user data to 3rd parties (I doubt Google currently does it on a large since it’s in their interest to have a better ad network than its competitiors). A move similar to Reddit’s with their API and exclusive search agreement or agreements to feed certain videos to AI would both fetch a higher price and upset the quality less since the vast majorty of videos watched are found through YouTube itself.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The idea behind breaking up a monopoly is to allow competition. So if a competitor to YouTube arises, then both companies will have to offer better service to entice more users.

        • WldFyre@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          How would breaking up Google break up the “monopoly” of YouTube, which is what we were discussing.

          • Asifall@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The argument is that google uses integration between its own ad network and YouTube to outcompete any similar service. If anyone else tries to launch a video platform and sell ad space to google, which is likely given that google owns the world’s largest ad network, it’s in googles best interest to either give their own competitor an unfavorable deal or to completely lock them out of their ad marketplace.

            If YouTube and google were forced to operate as independent companies it eliminates this conflict of interest.