Would it make the internet better? Probably.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you’re following citations, may as well just search for the citations themselves… aka just a regular search engine.

    • Zeshade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes but the power of it is that you can in effect refine your search using natural language, like talking to a person, as it remembers the last 2-3 exchanges.

      And it presents the information the way you asked to see it.

      For example (my side of the “conversation”):

      • What is hamas?
      • Compared to Hezbollah?
      • what are the differences between Shia and Sunni?

      The citations confirm the information, they are not the end goal. The added value is the fact that the information is pre-digested and presented in a way that matches my learning process. It’s a lot easier for me to assimilate information by getting answers to questions that I’ve asked.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, if search hadn’t become dog shit I’d be happy with it

      Instead, everything is a video for some reason, and the results are purposely worse than a year ago…I don’t want to watch a video, I can read 20x faster than I can listen, I don’t want to read an ad in article form - I’m generally looking for one little nugget of information

      I took this into my own hands - I’ll use free services if they work, but increasingly they’re just demos for a product that may or may not be better. So I spun up a searx container, I point a local LLM at it, and I let it filter read through results. My next stage is to crawl documentation, use LLMs to feed it into a vector db, and use AI to retrieve exactly what I want without sifting through garbage myself