• BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, Senate) to do pretty much anything. They’ve had that for [drumroll please] 4 out of the last 24 years. Or 6 of the last 32 years. Or 6 of the last 44 fucking years.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’ve had that for [drumroll please] 4 out of the last 24 years

      It was significantly shorter than that when you consider Senate control to be 60, which is what’s needed to bypass the fillibuster.

    • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, Senate) to do pretty much anything.

      Thats not how politics works buddy. If what you said were true neither the dems or republicans would have passed any bills in the history of the “republic”. Clearly theres also horse trading, and bribery/lobbying you are pretending dont exist in order to make this weak point.

      • madjo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        With the obstructionist MAGA caucus in your government that would rather vote no to bipartisan bills because it would give a Democrat a win, barely any bills get passed!