I started his Stalin book hoping it would be a biography, but it felt like more of a historiography. It was talking about Trosky’s criticism of Stalin and Kruschev’s de-Stalinization and I wasn’t really into it. Not that it seemed like bad history but it wasn’t interesting or compelling from what I read.
It was talking about Trosky’s criticism of Stalin and Kruschev’s de-Stalinization and I wasn’t really into it
I’m not sure I understand why you’d be interested in a book about Stalin but not those things. They are essential for understanding why the picture of Stalin among the western left is so skewed today.
I started his Stalin book hoping it would be a biography, but it felt like more of a historiography. It was talking about Trosky’s criticism of Stalin and Kruschev’s de-Stalinization and I wasn’t really into it. Not that it seemed like bad history but it wasn’t interesting or compelling from what I read.
It’s not a biography in any shape or form, that wasn’t Losurdos goal. He specifically criticises how Stalin is portrayed in media and history.
yeah I mean its in the sub-title. History and Critique of a Black Legend
I’m not sure I understand why you’d be interested in a book about Stalin but not those things. They are essential for understanding why the picture of Stalin among the western left is so skewed today.
I misunderstood the premise of the book. I thought it would be more biographical than historiographical.