asudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square181fedilinkarrow-up1688arrow-down187 cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldlinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.worldbitwarden@lemmy.mlbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.denews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
arrow-up1601arrow-down1external-linkConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comasudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square181fedilink cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldlinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.worldbitwarden@lemmy.mlbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.denews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
minus-squareschizo@forum.uncomfortable.businesslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down1·1 day agoDon’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap. If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
minus-squarehumorlessrepost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 day agoThat’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).
Don’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap.
If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
That’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).