• CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Hopefully Qualcomm takes the hint and takes this opportunity to develop a high performance RISC V core. Don’t just give the extortionists more money, break free and use an open standard. Instruction sets shouldn’t even require licensing to begin with if APIs aren’t copyrightable. Why is it OK to make your own implentation of any software API (see Oracle vs. Google on the Java API, Wine implementing the Windows API, etc) but not OK to do the same thing with an instruction set (which is just a hardware API). Why is writing an ARM or x86 emulator fine but not making your own chip? Why are FPGA emulator systems legal if instruction sets are protected? It makes no sense.

    The other acceptable outcome here is a Qualcomm vs. ARM lawsuit that sets a precedence that instruction sets are not protected. If they want to copyright their own cores and sell the core design fine, but Qualcomm is making their own in house designs here.

    • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      Saying an ISA is just a hardware API vastly oversimplifies what an architecture is. There is way more to it than just the instruction set, because you can’t have an instruction set without also defining the numbers and types of registers, the mapping of memory and how the CPU interacts with it, the input/output model for the system, and a bunch of other features like virtual memory, addressing modes etc. Just to give an idea, the ARM reference is 850 pages long.

    • scarilog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      5 hours ago

      takes this opportunity to develop a high performance RISC V core

      They might. This would never be open sourced though. Best case scenario is the boost they would provide to the ISA as a whole by having a company as big as Qualcomm backing it.

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 hours ago

        RISC V is just an open standard set of instructions and their encodings. It is not expected nor required for implementations of RISC V to be open sourced, but if they do make a RISC V chip they don’t have to pay anyone to have that privilege and the chip will be compatible with other RISC V chips because it is an open and standardized instruction set. That’s the point. Qualcomm pays ARM to make their own chip designs that implement the ARM instruction set, they aren’t paying for off the shelf ARM designs like most ARM chip companies do.

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 hours ago

        In the mobile Linux scene, Qualcomm chips are some of the best supported ones. I don’t love everything Qualcomm does, but the Snapdragon 845 makes for a great Linux phone and has open source drivers for most of the stack (little thanks to Qualcomm themselves).

        • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          55 minutes ago

          Qualcomm is one of the worst monopolists in any industry though. They are widely known to have a stranglehold on all mobile device development

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Don’t just give the extortionists more money

      Or maybe they were just trying to pay a lot less money, and then they got caught at their little trick.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Do you know how much money you have to pay to make a RISC V chip? Even less than that, since it’s free

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Development is never free, especially, if you have to build new knowhow and can not build upon the one they have built at development of ARM chips.

        • mannycalavera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If it’s that’s easy / cheap then why have they not?

          This is a big ol’ game of bluff from both sides. So, according to you, Qualcomm should call their bluff?