Dr. Angela Collier plays the Binding of Isaac: Rebirth and talks at length about what went wrong with string theory, and how that affected science communication.

  • zalack@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Theory in science generally means something much more stringent than it does in vernacular. From Wikipedia:

    A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world and universe that can be (or a fortiori, that has been) repeatedly tested and corroborated in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results. Where possible, theories are tested under controlled conditions in an experiment.[1][2] In circumstances not amenable to experimental testing, theories are evaluated through principles of abductive reasoning. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge.

    A scientific theory differs from a scientific fact or scientific law in that a theory explains “why” or “how”: a fact is a simple, basic observation, whereas a law is a statement (often a mathematical equation) about a relationship between facts and/or other laws.

    So when something is being put forward as “A Scientific Theory” it is meant to be taken as the best possible explanation we can make of why the universe is the way it is, backed by exhaustive tests using the best methods currently available to us.

    In science, when something is just a theory in the way you mean, it’s called a hypothesis.

    • qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In grad school I audited a few classes of “The Physics of Evolution,” and there was one quote from the professor that stuck with me. It was, loosely, “Some people claim evolution is ‘only a theory,’ but they have it backwards — evolution is a fact, but it’s a lousy theory!”