linucs@lemmy.ml to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 15 hours agoIs there an historical reason why female formal dresses have a huge variety of styles compared to male ones where the only acceptable style is jacket with pants?message-squaremessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1118arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1115arrow-down1message-squareIs there an historical reason why female formal dresses have a huge variety of styles compared to male ones where the only acceptable style is jacket with pants?linucs@lemmy.ml to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 15 hours agomessage-square40fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareinfinitevalence@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·15 hours agohttps://youtu.be/uAKMolRKphE?si=T7SS0saI_GFQtdrj Derek Guy breaks it down some in this podcast. But it was a shift in the house of commons in England as it was working Man’s clothing and was a way to signal you were with the people and not aristocracy.
minus-squareCall me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·10 hours agoBoy did that work out.
https://youtu.be/uAKMolRKphE?si=T7SS0saI_GFQtdrj
Derek Guy breaks it down some in this podcast. But it was a shift in the house of commons in England as it was working Man’s clothing and was a way to signal you were with the people and not aristocracy.
Boy did that work out.