linucs@lemmy.ml to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 month agoIs there an historical reason why female formal dresses have a huge variety of styles compared to male ones where the only acceptable style is jacket with pants?message-squaremessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1150arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1146arrow-down1message-squareIs there an historical reason why female formal dresses have a huge variety of styles compared to male ones where the only acceptable style is jacket with pants?linucs@lemmy.ml to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square47fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCorkyskog@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoMany people blame Beau Brummel https://www.esquire.com/style/mens-fashion/a26870204/beau-brummell-style-toxic-masculinity/
minus-squaredumples@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoAh aristocratic English man. What haven’t you made terrible
minus-squarecabillaud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoFun fact:Charles II of England is considered to be the inventor of the three-pieces suit. At the time, French King Louis XIV ordered his footmen to adopt the vest as a way to debase the new English style.
Many people blame Beau Brummel
https://www.esquire.com/style/mens-fashion/a26870204/beau-brummell-style-toxic-masculinity/
Ah aristocratic English man. What haven’t you made terrible
Fun fact:Charles II of England is considered to be the inventor of the three-pieces suit. At the time, French King Louis XIV ordered his footmen to adopt the vest as a way to debase the new English style.