• ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      But will they, that’s the question.

      They have the ability to, but if they won’t, then we still end up with the same two choices. And if picking the other side won’t make them change their mind, then whatever they can do is irrelevant in a conversation about what will produce the best tangible outcome.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I reject and condemn any system that says I can only choose between two genocidal monsters. There is no redeeming value to be had.

        • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          Then I suppose you simply must reject the world we live in right now.

          Both sides are going to continue the genocide, we know that, it’s their stated positions. The most we can do with our votes in the current election is take a stance of harm reduction, since that’s the only choice available. Anything else won’t make a change to the system of oppression facing the Palestinians today.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            46 minutes ago

            There is no “harm reduction”. I do reject the parts and people of the world that revel in or even accept the wholesale slaughter of children. Bargaining with their lives is moral bankruptcy, and signifies a total lack of value. Let me ask you a question: can you imagine anything that would cause you to not vote for the democrats? If full throated support for genocide isn’t a bridge too far, I have to wonder if you have any absolute principles at all.