• jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not, but you have a DOJ that is afraid of doing anything that might look ‘political’. We know enough that this whole scheme was coordinated from the very top, but they slow walked the whole thing so we’re now in the situation where Trump could get elected again and make the whole thing go away.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s not, but you have a DOJ that is afraid of doing anything that might look ‘political’.

      Which is itself political, and 100000000% corrupt.

    • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Seeing as how people have already been indicted for this shit, knowing that this is potentially coming, I don’t think they’re going to have the same kid gloves on this time. And the orange stain isn’t in power anymore. However we will see soon enough!

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I guess that’s what I don’t get. How can stealing/destroying ballots not be considered “political”, but figuratively throwing out all of the ballots and unilaterally picking the winner be protected as “political”.

      It seems both are major crimes to democracy, whatever political party happened to commit said crimes.

      Unless there’s some grey area not explicitly addressed in law wrt electors.