Got this creepy bullshit in the mail today.

Glad I voted for Harris/Walz

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    i think it’s all going to come down to how badly do women not want to be wholly owned by their MAGAt men. that’s going to determine whether the american project was successfully killed by putin.

  • MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I prefer the French Left take on the idea. They did a campaign awhile back titled: “The fascists are voting, are you?” With a big portrait of the most well-known far right politician in the country. In the end they had to pay a 3000€ fine but I’d say it was worth it.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      3000€ seems like barely a drop in the bucket of campaigning costs, totally worth it lol. To the point that’s not even a disincentive.

    • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Please tell me you picked this image on purpose.

      Just outside the voting location, a giant billboard that says, “Vote yes, says the terrifying building sized gremlin of the state”

  • Breve@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It also strongly encourages people to return their ballots in person likely because the GOP is already set to challenge mail-in ballots as “rigged”.

  • cybervseas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They’re 100% implying your family (husband) will know who you voted for, so you better vote “correctly”.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That screams cya. Everything else implies they see you. I received an email by them once that at the end had the sleeping with the fishes capiche line. Literally with no context/reason beyond making it sound like a threat.

      • cowardsgfy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        good! but still, why do they get to be the ones who do all the intimidation? i think it’s time we made them scared.

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Because they’re shitty people and threats and intimidation are the only way they can win. We don’t do the same thing, because we are better than them. Stooping to their level would make us just as bad.

          • Wilzax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Stooping to their level on campaign tactics would not make us just as bad, because our means are equal and the ends we want to achieve are nobler than theirs.

            If A=B and C>D, then A+C > B+D

  • ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Both parties are running these style ads in my area.

    This is BY FAR the creepiest iteration I’ve seen.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Yeah but (IME) the Democrat version is essentially: No one will know if you vote Kamala, even your likely abusive maga spouse. (Edit- https://www.salon.com/2024/10/31/it-is-so-disastrous-maga-men-are-freaking-out-that-wives-may-be-secretly-voting-for-kamala-harris/)

      The R version is apparently: Those of you who didn’t vote will be up against the wall if Kamala gets in because it will be your fault. Busybody neighbors are important to ensure Trump gets in again, we’re watching you.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Both parties are running these style ads in my area.

      please post examples of the dems doing this, I’d like to see what kind of rhetoric they’re deploying.

      Have seen NOTHING like this from the left in my corner of the country.

      • ccunning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I’ve mostly seen YouTube ads so not sure how to share those here. I happened to get another postcard today though, with the exact same wording is the one I linked to elsewhere in this thread:

        If you look at votingmatters.org it says:

        Paid for by the Democratic National Committee (202) 863-8000
        This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

      • sibannac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        54 minutes ago

        I got two from a local WA Dem organization. I got them right after I voted and the rhetoric seems to be along the lines of “don’t forget to turn in your ballot!” Nothing specific on the first. The second one was more specific and showed a table of the last four elections and whether or not a vote was cast. I’ll try to remember to post a pic later.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I wonder if it’s proximity to a swing state… safely blue state here, I could vote red 20 times and it wouldn’t even register. still going to vote blue.

          thank you for the links above!

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 minutes ago

            I didn’t vote for my local da because she ran unopposed (and she excused a cop for wrongdoing when he shot a kid in the back)

    • PassingDuchy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Not sure which party, but I’ve been getting the same notice in the mail every ~3 days with this message and my voting record listed all the way back to 2016 for the past two weeks. Honestly not sure if it’s an attempt to intimidate me to vote a certain way because it sure is going beyond “people will know if you voted” to kind of insinuating they’ll know who I vote for. Fail point is I don’t know acronyms for political groups so I’m not sure which one they’re trying to get me to vote for lol

      • ccunning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 hours ago

        This is the first clearly partisan one I’ve seen.

        Mostly I’ve seen them as videos that plainly state. “Who you vote for is secret. Whether you vote is public record”. I did get one handwritten postcard saying the same.

        I found them mostly “interesting” as a concept, but others have felt they’re threatening:

        The first one I saw I looked up the “Paid for by…” entity and it was a Kamala PAC so I just kinda assumed they all were before seeing this.

        • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          People are crazy. Feeling threatened by telling someone “hey, you didn’t vote last time. Please make your voice heard by voting” is wearing your persecution complex on your sleeve.

          Fragile fucks.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Its none of there business to tell someone to vote. I strongly think we need solid privacy protections for voters. Keeping it private and independent will help with our democracy in general.

            It is a little over the top bringing its a threat but I see where they are coming from. I imagine any parent would be a little annoyed to have they child get stalked by a political party.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Yeah I don’t think that’s a threat, poorly worded maybe. The Trump one was hinting at it (because plausible deniability is how they work).

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The point is that both sides have lost there minds. Trying to pretend that the Democrats are somehow less worse is silly. Call them out for what it is. That’s the only way you will see change.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                “But the fact that you voted is pubic record” implies “we’re paying attention and could hassle in some form those who abstain if we choose.”

                (Well, that’d be the argument for “threat” in the above text anyway. Imo threat or not it’s poorly worded leading to it being creepy, but that’s probably the extent of it. I doubt we’ll see any side round up and execute abstainers or some crazy shit like that.)

                • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 hours ago

                  Seriously?

                  implies

                  What is implied depends on the tone in which it is said.

                  From the GOP that “whether or not you vote is public record” in a sudden red text, and “your family friends and coworkers will know”, along with fucking binoculars carries a very sinister tone.

                  The Dems “Thank you!” and “Please vote” does not. The whether you vote is public record looks to me pretty matter of fact. Why it’s even said is a bit out of place, which is what I said was poorly worded.

                  This is not “both sides same” like the other guy suggested.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I can’t wait for when everyone’s data gets leaked. Both sides collect huge amounts of data and do highly targeted campaigns.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    This is “interesting” to be sure.

    Its frankly terrible how much stalking the campaigns do. This isn’t something that is Republican or Democrat. They wonder why they are having issues with voter turn out but then they do and turn elections into a massive invasion of personal rights. They want to stalk you to get you to believe the current propaganda.

    You know what would help in the current political turmoil? Better privacy and transparency.

    • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Hey! HEY! That is a vile insinuation! They’d never do that and also they only suppress votes for the other party and those don’t count anyway, so what if they do it when it’s perfectly fine seeing how they could never win if they allowed the election to be run fairly, and in conclusion, voter suppression is great and everybody should do it (except for non-republicans).

      Wait, what were we talking about again?

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Never knew republicans thrived on increased turnout. Glad they’re still sticking with this democratic principle ig.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Republicans need young men to turn out; from what I can see, they are trending conservative. They don’t want young women to turn out, because they are trending overwhelmingly liberal.

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      It doesn’t really read the same when coming from Democrats, though. Both sides are not the same, and only one of them has been known for making threats of political violence.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I know, I’m saying I was pleasantly surprised to hear that the campaign wants increased turnout in the first place.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Why doubt? The party has made it part of their platform to distrust the voting process. It sounds like a threat because it is one.