Green politicians from across Europe on Friday called on U.S. Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein to withdraw from the race for the White House and endorse Democrat Kamala Harris instead.

“We are clear that Kamala Harris is the only candidate who can block Donald Trump and his anti-democratic, authoritarian policies from the White House,” Green parties from countries including Germany, France, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Ireland, Estonia, Belgium, Spain, Poland and Ukraine said in a statement, which was shared with POLITICO ahead of publication

  • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    No one is saying anything had to happen, but she was certainly invited there there for a reason.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      You don’t get put at a dinner table in Moscow with Putin unless Putin has a good reason for wanting you there.

      He doesn’t just sit down with random people and hope they have a good time.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s basically what this person seems to be suggesting. Like she just happened to be sitting there and Putin and all of his closest people were like, “let’s go see who this lady is and what she’s up to!”

          • Saurok@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            Except it’s not what I’m suggesting at all. I haven’t suggested anything. I’ve posted what Stein has said happened, which she says was a dinner at a RT anniversary gala where Putin only briefly sat at their table, no introductions were made, and no English-Russian conversations happened. If you have evidence of something else happening there, as you seem to be suggesting, then provide it.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              If you have evidence of something else happening there

              Ah, I see the problem. You aren’t reading my posts. Let me help you:

              • Saurok@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’ve read all of your replies. Why would I believe that happened without evidence? Have you proven that she’s networked with Russians or Putin? Suggesting something might have happened isn’t evidence of the thing happening.

                  • Saurok@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Repeating things isn’t providing evidence. As I’ve said in another comment, being at a dinner table with someone isn’t evidence of collusion. Putin sitting at a table with someone, even if he’s the one who chose to seat himself there, isn’t evidence that that person is colluding with him. He’s sat at dinner tables with Hillary Clinton. Does that mean Clinton is a Russian asset? You’d recognize that claim as absurd without evidence surely?

    • Saurok@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, sure. I’m not saying that Russians didn’t have a nefarious reason to invite her there. It’s entirely possible and maybe even likely that they did it because they saw a third party candidate as a useful tool to sow some sort of election discord in the US. But that claim would be entirely different than the claim that Jill Stein did it because she’s an asset or that this was her idea or purpose for being there. I’m disputing the latter, not the former, because her attending a gala for RT is not evidence of collusion and this was the implication being made. I can find all sorts of pictures online of Hillary Clinton and other politicians having dinners with Trump or Putin, but that doesn’t mean the photos are evidence that they were in collusion with either of them.