Nemeski@lemm.ee to Bitwarden@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish · 19 days agoBitwarden is now verified on Flathub for Linuxlemmy.mlimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1113arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: bitwarden@lemmy.worldlinux@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1110arrow-down1imageBitwarden is now verified on Flathub for Linuxlemmy.mlNemeski@lemm.ee to Bitwarden@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish · 19 days agomessage-square24fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: bitwarden@lemmy.worldlinux@lemmy.ml
minus-squarepenquin@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down17·19 days agoDidn’t they just go closed source? I switched to proton pass.
minus-squareBakedCatboy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·19 days agoThe last I heard about that it turned out that the inclusion of a non free dependency was a packaging mistake and has been supposedly fixed “The sdk-secrets repository and packages will no longer be referenced from the client apps, since that code is not used there.”
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·17 days agoqv “walking it back”
minus-squareBookmeat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-218 days agoWhy? Is there a self-hosted version of proton pass available?
minus-squarepenquin@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·19 days agoI’m not sure, but proton pass is actually better. At least the UI looks clean and modern.
Didn’t they just go closed source? I switched to proton pass.
The last I heard about that it turned out that the inclusion of a non free dependency was a packaging mistake and has been supposedly fixed
“The sdk-secrets repository and packages will no longer be referenced from the client apps, since that code is not used there.”
qv “walking it back”
Why? Is there a self-hosted version of proton pass available?
I’m not sure, but proton pass is actually better. At least the UI looks clean and modern.