• multicolorKnight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I honestly can’t understand why most of the popular social media providers are popular. But, if that’s what it takes, could we not?

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t want it to be popular. I want to have a good conversation, in the communities i choose to participate in, and that’s exactly what I found

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The Fediverse is only gonna get better. The other ones will all come and go.

    In some number of years after another social media debacle or two, once the Fediverse has had some time to ditch its FOSS clunkiness, it’ll be game over for anything else.

  • 7ai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    We need to make it popular against all corporate forces like meta, X, bluesky etc. By creating more content and interacting with it more.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    It’s popular enough for me already. I kind of hope it doesn’t become the online site because that will just attract trolls.

    I’ve also been using Trust Café (aka WT.Social) but I like the Lemmy UI a lot better.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Lemmy doesn’t have to be Reddit. Lemmy is Lemmy. Keep coming here and giving it content and it will be all it will ever need to be.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    How do you define popular? I think it already is reasonably popular, I see enough activity here that it prompts me to comment at least somewhere on most days. I think it’s going to become more popular over time.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      If I saw this question posted the first time I visited Lemmy (some months before the Reddit app drama) with “popular” being defined as the current level of activity, my clear answer would be a loud and clear “probably not”.

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I meant to say that I would never have believed back then that Lemmy would become as popular as it is today.

          My point is that it’s a moving target. Reddit has a billion active users. Instagram has two billion. I don’t think these make sense as targets.

  • _____@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    very hot take:

    regular people will never get rid of twitter or meta, Facebook. YouTube. it’s incompatible with their psychology.

    they need to use what other people are using, they need to see “content” from their followed users

    switching to another platform will kill that for them for weeks and stall their “growth”

    to be forward thinking and to give up something you’ve had is too much for the average person

    which is why I’m on Lemmy: there’s nothing reddit offers to me that makes me “give” it up, it’s always been there but now that there’s competition it’s worth trying something new out

    I honestly think id anything Lemmy will have a slow decrease of users until it comes to a halt

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I mean, noone used reddit 10 years ago. To a 37 year old like myself, that seems like the reddit shit blew up out of nowhere. Youtube is just a matter of time and outcome of future google break up cases before a legitimate competition comes for its industry share. FB will die with the boomers. The only one I see as a really unmovable object is Twitter because of the universal use by all major sports media/reporting/journalists. It’s the only one with end users applying the platform in any comercial sense outside of marketing. I think the question OP is asking will on the reliance of one of the other platforms falling.

      Just my opinion tho so take it with a grain of salt.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Everyone looks at mega businesses as immune to decay. They’re not it just takes longer.

        I think “x” may actually be the first to topple though. It’s losing money at an insane rate and that’s with a mega election year propping it up. That’s one of the reasons Elon is pushing Trump so hard, is for the government bail out he’ll get.

        • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You are so fuckin high on the anti Elon hivemind smoke it’s clouding your ability to quantify how much money he has and the fact that X is now an entirely private company. You think he is doing all the Trump shit for a bail out from a government who, has only issued a bailout that applied to privately held companies once in its almlst 250 year existence?

          Homie, I think he’s an idiot as much as the next but let’s come down from mars and back to reality. Then we will circle back and cover how much money 250 billion dollars is and how the entire presence of Twitter could leave, bankruptcy the company and still be a massive tax write off without any favorable treatment from DC beyond what perks he already qualifies for by being of the .000000001% tax backracket minority.

          It’s losing money at an insane rate and that’s with a mega election year propping it up.

          We won’t even make a stink about your typo that twitter’s advertisement revenue stream as being driven by the same mechanisms used to figure out a YouTube influencer’s advertivment revenue stream. We will call it an autocorrect oversight that your comment accidentally says the election attention and resulting increase of user activity affect how much companies pay twitter for its advertising spots and not the number of likes or subscriptions or user visits because they would be insane to agree to terms where the amount they’re invoiced is dependent on statistics that can’t decipher between bot accounts and active user accounts.

          If ya made it to the end of this and your take away is that I’m a Elon stan, re-read it or tell me why because I cognizantly tried to make sure none of my over the top satirical statements made in this reply would tip a hat or give any slight implications that would credit Elon for being a shrewd or competent business owner. I’m just sick of the fuck Elon hivemind ignoring very objective facts about how shit works in lazy replies only intended to get their shot in at beating the dead horse named Elon’s and Idiot.

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            JFC, that is a lot of uneducated nonsense. “X” is losing 400-500 million a year, we know this from companies that lent him money and are public. I never said Elon would go bankrupt just “X”. Trump has constantly done anything he wants without care to precedence and has shown that he’ll do anything for a dollar. He also is a dementia laden fool that can be led around like a puppy right now.

            I never said Elon was an idiot, that’s why I think he’ll get Trump to bail “X” out. Specifically because you don’t get that rich by losing money or passing up a chance to earn the kind of money he can off of Trump.

    • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Hey, I had a conversation on Matrix that one time!

      And my Mastodon feed has TONS of content from George Takei.

    • jonathan@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think people don’t realise how old Reddit is, it was smaller than Lemmy is now when I first started using it.

          • lordnikon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I was there too i was one of the ones that jumped over. I know its a big internet so maybe we both had different experiences. So maybe you are right and the timing was just a correlation and not causation.

            • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              reddit used to release page-views and maybe user info (i forget) annually.

              there was a bunch of users that jumped over to digg, but they continued to also use reddit. when digg died there was a small bump of digg users, but i dont recall anything noticable in the big subs

              • lordnikon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Ah I only used Digg and never heard of reddit till Digg died and never joined most of the big subs. But also reddit was so small back then a small bump is a good kick start. Google trends data correlates with what I saw Digg was more search for in 2008 then by 2011 Digg was dead after the 4.0 debacle in 2010 and reddit took off in 2011.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        and no subreddits! i was there too! it really started gaining traction and losing technical users when the ‘image macros’ started… memes took over

      • Social media in general was also a lot smaller back then too.

        Until the iPhone got popular you had to use a computer to access it. And back then we didn’t really trust sleep mode very much so you had to wait 2 minutes for windows to boot when you wanted to go on the net. VS right now I’m standing in from of my clothes not getting ready for work for 45 seconds.

        • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Wait to boot? Back then I had a dozen machines all running 24/7 lol. But I guess the average user on the consumer side yeah.

      • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        it was smaller than Lemmy is now when I first started using it.

        so now we know whom to blame for its enshittification