I highly doubt the left will do anything uncivil. How can they win back the country? Is it too late?

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s been “too late” for 'mericans to “win back the country” for a couple of decades at least. I mean, the entire electoral/voting system needs to be redone from the ground up because it’s very non-democratic.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If Trump won the electoral college but not the popular vote I’d say it is.non-Democratic. But he won the popular vote too. So half the country are just self destructive.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        There’s a lot of fuckery that happened since before and after the election. They fucked with the census to give red states more ec votes. They changed voting rules and redistricted in many states. They got ballots thrown out in certain areas. Yesterday the voting computer system in my (blue) county didn’t work for the first two hours fortunately I voted early. There’s also a lot more nuanced targeted misinformation out there now. People have these ideas in their heads and I have no clue where they came from. I block ads all the time but I imagine places like TikTok can easily manipulate people without anybody around them knowing about it.

      • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        California has only counted around half their votes so a popular vote win for Kamala could be a thing.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        People don’t vote because they see the system is rigged so the popular vote isn’t a great standard to go by either, it’s a product of the system as well

        If you had 100% turnout the popular vote would be very different.

        • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          People don’t vote because they see the system is rigged so the popular vote isn’t a great standard to go by either, it’s a product of the system as well

          My area is such a strong republican district that my vote is functionally irrelevant aside from the president. Hell, they didn’t even bother with democrat candidates on a local level.

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            If that were me I would run as an independent, people love that on a local level. “I’m putting town/county first!” And say I’m going to fix the roads people LOVE talking about how bad the roads are when it comes to local politics.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yes. The Dems lost this election more than the Reps won it.

        And no, it’s not just Harris. It’s the fact they haven’t accomplished anything substantially changing the lives of people for dozens of years, and they fought more against people like Sanders than people like Cheney.

        • smackjack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Doesn’t help that you have old hags like Nancy Pelosi refusing to relinquish any power and pass the torch to someone younger. People shouldn’t have to wait for you to die to take the reigns.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Limp dick DNC shills corpo agenda than pika face when peasants dont stay loyal to “the good team”

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            The ACA, which brought US healthcare from an 18th century level to a 19th century one in 2010, was a half measure under Obama, he got reelected for it, he was president for 7 more years after he signed that.

            First time voters today were 4 years old when it happened. What else has the Democratic Party been doing? How about the housing crisis? How about inflation? Oh, they got that one 1400 USD stimmy check passed after Trump looted the coffers for corpos big and small.

            Look, I’m not saying Harris wasn’t the better, less destructive choice. I’m saying something had had to happen, and people didn’t turn out for a candidate who said the past four years and the way the world is going is good. Not as well as for someone who saw problems and proposed - admittedly monstrous and ineffective - solutions.

      • troglodytis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yes. It’s not half of America, it’s half of the voters. Things would change drastically if only the nonvoter voted.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Things would change drastically if only the nonvoter voted.

          There is a big fat assumption in there, a similar reason why kamala lost…

      • Johanno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        If you consider that more people didn’t vote for Trump and he still won, then yes.