And I’m being serious. I feel like there might be an argument there, I just don’t understand it. Can someone please “steelman” that argument for me?

  • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Do you feel like your inaction is fine because either way, the genocide doesn’t end?

    Pretty much. Less genocide is not a compelling argument. The children who died with Kamala in the White House would be just as dead with Trump.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      What about the kids who wouldn’t die under kamala but now will? You say less genocide is the same, but even if it’s 10% less, I bet those 10% of kids would want kamala.

      • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Any innocent death is unacceptable. If under Trump every single Palestinian in Gaza would be killed and under Kamala a single old man would die, I still would make the same choice.

        That old man has just as much right to live as anyone else, just because he is the only casualty that doesn’t make his life any less valuable or gives someone any more right to kill him.

        I am truly sorry this is the outcome we have gotten and that my actions have played a small part in how things have unfolded. But I do not regret my choice not to vote.