Phil doing what Don couldn’t

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t. They clarify that owning a copy of the game does not confer copyright ownership, and they outline public performance rights, but it’s ownership over a physical object in the same way owning a lamp is, or perhaps more appropriately, the way in which owning a book is.

      If you say that you “own a copy of Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell,” no one crawls out of the work to argue IP and copyright law. Everyone understands what is meant.

      This is no different.

      • lemonflavoured@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given the wording of some EULAs that’s debatable. Not that those clauses would be enforceable if anyone actually tried, mind you.