The taped banana - now perhaps one of the most expensive fruits ever sold - was actually bought earlier in the day for a mere $0.35, according to the New York Times.

  • Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    It’s really just one of a limited number of licenses which allows the owner of the license to showcase the work and legally regard it as an official work from the artist who first came up with the idea. Anyone can tape a banana to a wall, but only a few can do so and say that it’s an ‘original’.

    • Mojave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago
      • who gives a shit if it’s original or derivative
      • Tape a different fruit and it’s now a new original
      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Do this as an institution you’ll get nuked in court.

        Do this as an individual nobody will pay to see it.

        The more you complain the more it’s worth.

        People pay money to see it because it’s controversial.

        That’s why it’s art.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I don’t know if I can trust the license. Any way to make it burn a ton of electricity to function?