cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22334414
Summary
Two transgender women, Dahlia and Jess, were attacked at a Minneapolis rail station, with onlookers cheering their assailants instead of helping.
After confronting a man yelling transphobic slurs, the situation escalated into a violent assault involving four or five others, leaving both women unconscious.
Advocates attribute the rise in anti-trans violence to emboldened transphobia fueled by misinformation and political rhetoric, including Donald Trump’s anti-LGBTQ+ policies.
The local trans community is responding with solidarity rallies, self-defense classes, and firearm training to prepare for a potential increase in attacks.
Police are investigating, but no arrests have been made.
All self defense classes should be mma. If you are learning anything else you are wasting your time. Mma teaches you the footwork needed to stike on the feet, defend Takedowns, clinch and submissions.
Some of these fucking comments, jeez. Interesting how its always the highly victimized populations who get the “Kumbayah” speech, and not the people who follow those populations around harassing them to use ANY response as justification for violence.
Very Christian guys. I’m sure Jesus would love all this violence!
“Jesus is a woke DEI hire and we don’t listen to that libshit.”
-American “Religious” Right
Middle eastern hippie Jew says be kind to each other and pay taxes! Nail to cross!
This is America. They’d shoot him or lynch him. We don’t like to waste time when we execute innocents.
Slave labor is legal so long as they may make him work a bit beforehand.
I just don’t understand how so much hate can exist for your fellow person :(
truly appalling & super sad :(
Please arm yourselves and learn to shoot. Never pull a gun you are unwilling or unable to shoot.
people shouldn’t need to murder other people in order to live safely. responsibility for 100% of this falls on the violent fuckheads who assault innocents. nothing more needs to be done than taking them out of the community. asserting that innocent victims safety should be predicated on their ability to shoot others, and the likelihood that assholes willing to assault innocent people are also the same kinds of assholes who would carry firearms leads me to believe that the assholes are the problem, not the victims.
for fuck’s sake, stop blaming victims and fix the fuckheads already.
You cannot fix stupid in anyone else except yourself. You cannot force curiosity or self awareness. You can inspire them, but this is not deterministic.
It sucks. It is not blaming the victim. It is acknowledgement of the fact that worrying about things you cannot change is a pointless and useless waste of time. Only worry about things that are within your power to change right now. You can alter you. You can take every measure available to defend and protect you. In the present climate of politics, you need to take every available measure seriously. I have no emotion in this recommendation. It has nothing to do with blame or individuals. I don’t care that the victims here were trans. To me, we’re all just a spectrum of people and no people deserve prejudice or discrimination when they do no harm. Those that do harm deserve discrimination.
A gun is no guarantee and can be just as dangerous to the person carrying it, but personally, I would rather have control over my own destiny even if that means I only get to decide the one other person that leaves with me or if I’m ready to check out. That last one is loaded with my own chronic outlook and not intended as any implication or insinuation. I battle a lot with being a useless burden to family and get a ton of prejudice for other reasons. I get it. Life can suck when you’re different. Don’t go picking battles with your allies and friends willing to tell you the hard truths with love.
Problem: I want to kill myself, owning a firearm is probably a bad idea
taser + pepper gel are good alternatives to a firearm, if yr unwilling or unable to shoot at someone.
Don’t get into gunfights in train stations ffs
Counterpoint: get into a gunfight anywhere someone is trying to beat you to death and you have a gun
Fistfights exist everywhere but rampant gun violence does not. “Buy a gun to deal with that hypothetical problem” is terrible advice compared to, idk, deescalation training. Yeah if you’re already on the ground getting punched in the face it’s too late to deescalate but there were choices made before that. Buying a gun so you can shoot up a train station isn’t exactly the most beneficial way to deal with bigots as a society.
Non-fatally shooting one or two among a group of men that’s got you down on the ground attacking you is not “rampant gun violence.”
The problem is not hypothetical, we’re discussing it as it just happened.
It’s important to de-escalate, you’re right. Owning a firearm comes with many responsibilities that you must uphold as a gun owner, and responsibly weilding the firearm (including and especially not using it as an excuse to threaten whomever you may) is one of them. But in this situation, it seems as though the men struck first, last, and hardest.
You’re right also, that they could have just ignored it. And, without video, there’s no way to tell how intense the initial conversation was. But do you think asking to not be called slurs on the train deserves a response in physical force? And do you think being beaten by a group with a 2:1 ratio on your own does not deserve a response in physical force?
I’m not suggesting “shooting up a train station,” I’m suggesting using a firearm to deter a group of men that are beating you.
why should it be the victim’s responsibility to engage in a firefight just to exist in society?
There are more guns than people in the US. Gun violence there is rampant, more children are killed by guns than by cars. The cause of the gun violence IS the gun ownership. It’s the idea that when you have a problem - even a physical one - that the solution is a gun. That idea is unique amongst war-torn countries and the US. So no, shooting up a train station isn’t rampant gun violence. But the idea that you ought to is.
But the idea that you ought to is.
But that’s not the idea: self defense is not the same as a mass shooting, and you refusing to differentiate that gives me the vibe you aren’t arguing in good faith.
The UK doesn’t have gun violence, they have knife violence. So are you going to tell someone not to carry a knife for self defense because it’s a potentially deadly weapon?
that the solution is a gun.
Sometimes it is, bud, welcome to the real world. If you’re being attacked, especially if you’re outnumbered, your argument is basically “you should have talked your way out if it, or just taken the assault, rather than use a tool you may legally be allowed to use to protect yourself.” Do you ask rape victims what they were wearing before the assault too?
They clearly couldn’t rely on bystanders to intervene, like people attempted to for George Floyd, and the victims were outnumbered and clearly overpowered. Had one of them been carrying a firearm, the assholes who just assaulted two people for existing may have been deterred.
lol, you think only the victim will have a firearm?
you don’t think that if the victim pulls, the fuckheads will keep their firearms stowed and just accept it?
they aren’t wrong: gun violence is the result of too many guns in too many hands.
when these victims begin to light up the assholes, and a firefight erupts, will it be better that innocent bystanders are dead for freedumb?
Or just, you know, walk away? Try to deescalate the situation maybe? Pulling out a gun and blasting away seems like the worst option here.
Yeah I’ll try that if I’m ever on the ground being beaten by five grown men… Walking away.
Obviously you de-escalate when the situation calls for de-escalation. In this case, it was probably a good idea to just ignore those guys from the get-go. But you know what? That’s implying getting assaulted was the victims’ fault.
All those women did was ask to not be spoken to the way they were, and the man’s response to that was a sucker punch. That’s not a situation you can de-escalate, he already assaulted her. Maybe it would have been wiser to run off and lawyer up. But quite frankly, I respect that she stood her ground and clocked him one back.
Those women were assaulted, and maybe I would have dealt with one jackass smacking me differently. But if I’m on the ground with five grown men beating me senseless, sorry not sorry but one of us is gonna be limping for the rest of their life after this and it’s not gonna be me.
That’s dismissing all the actions that led up to being beaten. Once the first punch is thrown, sure do whatever you can to defend yourself. Unless we get video of the incident, we probably won’t know for sure what happened. But at least according to the article the victims “confronted” their harassers. I ride the MSP light rail everyday. Been harassed by, mostly mentally ill or drug addicted people, dozens of times. It sucks, but every time I keep my mouth shut and I walk away. One guy did try to punch me, but he missed and I was long gone before he had another chance. Don’t “confront” these psychos if you’re not ready for a fight.
That’s dismissing all the
actionsclothing choices that led up to beingbeatenraped.See how ridiculous your argument sounds now?
No, not really. I don’t think the two situations are all that comparable.
More victim blaming. You’re disgusting.
Besides that, not everyone’s gonna live just like you. Though you say we may not know for sure what happened, you assume that they straight-up started a fight with five guys because they did anything at all, which is wrong because it’s not what you would do. For all you claim to know the “confrontation” was them just saying “Hey, don’t call us that!” but you openly insist that they brought that brutality on themselves.
What a great way to make a better world, just sit down and shut up unless someone’s calling out a problem, at which point they’re the problem.
I’m just going by what the article says. If we find something different happened, I’d be willing to change my stance.
Aren’t you victim blaming as well, at least by your definition? They could have defended themselves if only they had a gun is putting the blame on them. I don’t really think either of you are victim blaming but at least be consistent.
The assailants are to blame, period. But that does not mean that the victims could not have avoided this. Acknowledging that is not the same as saying it was their fault and they are to blame. It is acknowledging their agency as people being assaulted (first verbally, then physically) and acknowledging that their options go beyond doing nothing, being assaulted, and buying and carrying a lethal weapon with them everywhere, much less shooting in a public building.
I’m really not dismissing anything. I’m saying that they absolutely could have ignored those men. But I also do not think they did anything wrong in confronting them - unless they used force themselves, which we won’t know unless a video comes out.
Those men threw the first punch, and I’m saying that you should be ready for something like that, and you should do whatever you can to defend yourself.
“Confronted” does not imply violence, I have no reason to believe the women were violent initially. You’re acting like they started the fight when confrontation could range anywhere from a full-on shouting match to asking them to stop saying that bullshit.
A guy did try to punch them, he didn’t miss, they weren’t long-gone after that because more men joined in. All I’m saying is it’s wise to keep a firearm (or Taser, or pepper spray) in case of an assault like that, and they’re right to defend themselves in that case.
I don’t think they started the fight. Apologies if that was my implication. I just have a vivid image in my mind of the people who committed this crime. You can’t reason with that type of person. If they say something fucked up you’re better off just ignoring it. These are not citizens in the traditional sense. They’re looking for a reason to start a fight. They have nothing to lose.
Oh, so one of the cities with the lowest levels of racial equality also has a problem with transphobia? I’m not shocked, I’m not surprised. Between this and the people in Springfield Ohio instilling fear in the towns Haitian residents, I will never understand how people can become so hateful.
I don’t understand why people think it’s a good idea to express themselves in a specific way if it WILL turn out badly for them. That’s just plain stupid and dangerous. Don’t get me wrong though, I fully believe people should be able to express themselves however they want. But that doesn’t mean one should walk around a warzone and think they wouldn’t get a bullet in their face because they oppose that war. Same goes for equality in a city without equality.
Stay safe.
It should not be forgotten that it was not the wider ‘people of Springfield’ who pushed that shit. There were certainly kooks/nazis in Springfield who were willing to say it, but the responsibility falls on the politicians/media organizations who maliciously propagated it.
People are emotional, tribal, creatures. It’s very easy for us to hate the out group. That was probably beneficial for pre-history humans, where the other tribe could be a real threat. It’s not so useful today, where “the other group” is just some people waiting for the train.
I think the best paths forward have to make people believe more people are in-group. That’s a reason why stuff like representation matters. People might be like “who cares if there’s a trans main character in a movie?”, but that helps people be less hateful. They don’t hate the character from the movie, they relate to them, and then a person in real life gets seen in that light.
