• TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It stems from the dialectical part of dialectical materialism.

      Yeah, but anyone can claim that they are acting within dialectical reasons. If you have some reading material that explains the actual dialectical process, I would love to give it a read.

      So the thought is basically “let’s get the shitty part out of the way, so we can get to the good stuff.”

      Yeah, but Lenin wrote specifically why this (tailism) is a mistake.

      “Lenin describes tailism in What Is to Be Done? as the tendency of some activists to drag (like a tail) behind the most progressive elements of the working-class movement, by reflecting in their politics only the most reactionary views of the masses.[1] This is a mistake, because, firstly, it underestimates the political and revolutionary potential of the working class, and secondly, communists must be the revolutionary vanguard of the struggle, not lagging behind it as reactionaries within the movement.”

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Haven’t read politzer, so I will have to give it a read. Thanks.

          However, I was moreso asking how dialectical materialism is being applied in a way that validates supporting right winged nationalist governments like Russia or Syria.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            It’s the entire concept of “critical support,” an enemy acting against a bigger enemy can be relied on with respect to their stance against said mutual enemy. Not everyone agrees with this approach, or that said enemy is not in fact the bigger enemy, hence the entire controversy. That’s the answer in as neutral terms as possible, you can ask Marxists directly in their comms for more info, this is a comm for Anarchism and I don’t wish to infringe on that.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              22 hours ago

              It’s the entire concept of “critical support,” an enemy acting against a bigger enemy can be relied on with respect to their stance against said mutual enemy.

              Does that not require a more indepth investigation into the motive of the country you are critically supporting, and isn’t that investigation reliant on perspective?

              In one perspective you could critically support Russia for inciting destructive competition between the great powers. While criticizing their motive, and means.

              On the other you could critically support Ukraine for defending themselves from colonial extraction from great power. While criticizing reactionary forces within their government.

              you can ask Marxists directly in their comms for more info, this is a comm for Anarchism and I don’t wish to infringe on that.

              Fair enough, just thought I should take the opportunity while I could. I have tried to breach this subject a couple different times in their comm, but tend to just get called a Nazi or other slurs.

              Thanks for the dialogue, I appreciate it.