VITecNet@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoFound in the wild: The world’s first unkillable UEFI bootkit for Linuxarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up187arrow-down115cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.zippulse_of_truth@infosec.pubtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up172arrow-down1external-linkFound in the wild: The world’s first unkillable UEFI bootkit for Linuxarstechnica.comVITecNet@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square7fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.zippulse_of_truth@infosec.pubtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squaremetaStatic@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up100arrow-down2·2 months ago found in the wild no evidence of actual infections in the wild you know I shouldn’t be disappointed by blatant lies in headlines with the state of journalism in current year but I still kinda am.
minus-squarePowerCrazy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoYou are disappointed because it doesn’t have to be this way.
minus-squarepastermil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·2 months agoI’m disappointed, but this is a good thing.
minus-squareMTK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·2 months agoYou can find it in the wild without finding evidence of infection. I think in this context found in the wild means that the sample was found in the wild, just maybe not running.
you know I shouldn’t be disappointed by blatant lies in headlines with the state of journalism in current year but I still kinda am.
Thanks for saving my time.
You are disappointed because it doesn’t have to be this way.
I’m disappointed, but this is a good thing.
You can find it in the wild without finding evidence of infection.
I think in this context found in the wild means that the sample was found in the wild, just maybe not running.