Does this burning at 200 j/g really mean it would be a lot safer or do you chalk this up to be company propaganda. Clearly it is a lot lower than gasoline, but since 600-900 proved to still be an issue, could this be enough to stabilize people’s fears you think?

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Given the fact we’re well within the Overpromise/Underdeliver Century, safest to take everything with a grain of salt…

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Agreed, that’s why I was asking more about perception and mentioned it as an entertainment piece in the comment above. Sometimes speculation can be fun though. Some of my fondest memories of technology coming out aren’t from the use, but the moments of discussion, expectations, and waiting. Like I never had a Wii, but I remember waiting for the Wii to launch at midnight back in the day. Sometimes you learn a lot more about a product than you would otherwise ever have looked into once it was already out by discussing the up and coming and comparing post launch.

      Will I ever own this product… I doubt it. But someday a product built off pieces of it’s design or maybe even largely copied, possibly.