Does this burning at 200 j/g really mean it would be a lot safer or do you chalk this up to be company propaganda. Clearly it is a lot lower than gasoline, but since 600-900 proved to still be an issue, could this be enough to stabilize people’s fears you think?

  • BETYU@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    not if you use subsidies to make it cheaper that means its not actually cheaper your just distorting the marked. it maters why there cheap.