Under the new restrictions, short-term renters will need to register with the city and must be present in the home for the duration of the rental

Home-sharing company Airbnb said it had to stop accepting some reservations in New York City after new regulations on short-term rentals went into effect.

The new rules are intended to effectively end a free-for-all in which landlords and residents have been renting out their apartments by the week or the night to tourists or others in the city for short stays. Advocates say the practice has driven a rise in demand for housing in already scarce neighbourhoods in the city.

Under the new system, rentals shorter than 30 days are only allowed if hosts register with the city. Hosts must also commit to being physically present in the home for the duration of the rental, sharing living quarters with their guest. More than two guests at a time are not allowed, either, meaning families are effectively barred.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because that’s the standard of living? A basement?

    Fully furnished? I own a home, my guest room is fully furnished in that it has a bed, desk, side tables, and a TV.

    Listen to yourself. Fully furnished doesn’t mean the same as configured with separate utilities, a separate entrance, a separate kitchen, or separate bathing facilities.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m glad you’re housing secure with a guest room, it must be nice.

      Some people would kill for a full furnished basement and instead of being rented out short term it could be housing someone instead and leave the short term to hotels.

      I really don’t understand why this is such a controversial view.

      • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I wouldn’t want someone living in my basement full time. I have no obligation to make that basement available to live in wtf kinda bullshit is this.

      • merridew
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        In this specific instance, I suspect it is because there is every indication that the basement room rented by OP was not, in fact, a fully self contained suite within a house, but was a guest room.

        How do you physically get into these “basement suites” in your part of the world? When I lived in a townhouse, access to the cellar was via a door in the middle of the property leading off the kitchen. There would be no practical way to split the cellar off from the main property as a separate dwelling. But having guests sleep down there every so often was no big deal.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Some are walk out basements and have their own ground level entry, some are a separate door and other are a door in the middle of shared living space.

          • merridew
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Interesting. Here, when conversions happen to make cellars into self-contained units, I’d argue they are frequently only suitable for short term lets, on the basis that no-one should have to live like that. In converting properties whose lower ground floors were never meant to be used for residential purposes into housing, we get stuff like this.

            Rental Opportunity of the Week: A Remodelled Crypt, for Goths Your own windowless basement in London Bridge, for just £2,000 a month.

            https://www.vice.com/en/article/akz9ze/rental-opportunity-london-bridge-basement

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s brutal but what if you have a choice of that or being homeless?

              Now if that’s being used as a hotel and your only choice left is to be homeless?

              There’s so many more problems then just airbnb but it’s not helping either.

              • merridew
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                It goes for £2000 a month ($2500) and is in Zone 1, a 25 minute stroll from the London Stock Exchange. You aren’t going homeless if you have £2000 a month to spend on rent, and Zone 2 is one stop away on the Jubilee line. You’re moving to Zone 2/3, or moving into a flatshare. Or out of London.

                Given the location, pricing and finish I suspect it’s more likely to be used as a pied a terre – a second (weekday) home – for someone in the City.

                  • merridew
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Correct. Well, not all the work week. One person will sleep in it Monday-Thursday. Maybe Friday if it’s a heavy one.

                    ETA: Rest of the family will be living in a separate house outside the Home Counties where the schools are better.