• CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s not true at all. Fallout can be carried by wind over very long distances. And even a small amount of radioactive iodine accumulative in the body can be an issue.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s more the fact that a war situation where nuclear weapons are used so frequently that the average person will need tablets will also see shortages of food, water and created large flows of refugees.

      Basically every bit of modern infrastructure would collapse, which would be far more impactful and urgent than iodine pills.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Again, you have it wrong.

        where nuclear weapons are used so frequently that the average person will need tablets

        All it takes is one nuke to go off and winds to carry the fallout to relatively stable countries far away.

        But let’s say that you are dealing with some level of societal collapse from nuclear war. You still need iodine. Without it, it won’t matter if you secure food, water, and shelter, because you’ll get some aggressive cancer and die anyways.

        Regardless of the specifics, iodine is important.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I think they are saying the odds are low that it will be just one nuke. More likely none, several, or a lot than just one.