• Nalivai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    And some of those citations and quotes will be completely false and randomly generated, but they will sound very believable, so you don’t know truth from random fiction until you check every single one of them. At which point you should ask yourself why did you add unneccessary step of burning small portion of the rainforest to ask random word generator for stuff, when you could not do that and look for sources directly, saving that much time and energy

    • PapstJL4U@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I, too, get the feeling, that the RoI is not there with LLM. Being able to include “site:” or “ext:” are more efficient.

      I just made another test: Kaba, just googling kaba gets you a german wiki article, explaining it means KAkao + BAnana

      chatgpt: It is the combination of the first syllables of KAkao and BEutel - Beutel is bag in german.

      It just made up the important part. On top of chatgpt says Kaba is a famous product in many countries, I am sure it is not.

    • bradd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      As a side note, I feel like this take is intellectually lazy. A knife cannot be used or handled like a spoon because it’s not a spoon. That doesn’t mean the knife is bad, in fact knives are very good, but they do require more attention and care. LLMs are great at cutting through noise to get you closer to what is contextually relevant, but it’s not a search engine so, like with a knife, you have to be keenly aware of the sharp end when you use it.

    • bradd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I guess it depends on your models and tool chain. I don’t have this issue but I have seen it for sure, in the past with smaller models no tools and legal code.