• OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      So why is that you picked Indian as being the common attribute among them? Why didn’t you say “a few married workers were terrible”, or “workers with 3 kids”, or “people over 50”? Why did you instantly jump to them being Indian to be the single defining attribute?

      THAT is prime racism.

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Right, but they were also under 6’ tall. Or were politically left-leaning. Or had dark hair. Or whatever other things they might share. Why didn’t you emphasize that? Did it even cross your mind that maybe the socio-economic background might have more influence on their work ethic than what country they happened to be born in?

          You didn’t even think twice about any of those factors and settled firmly on “Indian” as the single defining thing among them. That’s racism buried so deep you don’t even recognize it.

          I feel a bit bad for people like you. The first step in becoming a better person is recognizing your biases, accepting them, and trying to overcome them. You’re just in utter denial.

    • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s about the way it’s phrased. If you imply that the cause of their incompetence is the fact that they are Indian, well yeah that’s racist.

    • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I appreciate that someone gets it. I am the least racist person, I know plenty of useless Canadians too and have worked with useless Americans too