• _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    these places are telling on themselves making it a ‘requirement’. obviously it’s shittier in every way, if it was somehow exciting and fun and collaborative it would be a welcome announcement.

    we need better WFH laws, this could literally revolutionize society and it’s being rolled back because some rich dickheads starting gambling on office buildings

    • dill@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s more complicated I’m some places. I believe there are places where it’s not just a fear of depreciated building value. There are literally contracts in violation because they require a certain amount of occupancy.