• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    You think Valve taking an extortionate amount of the budget doesn’t affect you as a consumer?

    Games have budgets. With Valve taking as much money as the actual development budget for many games, the end product is significantly impacted. Games are regularly released late while missing features and so buggy as to not work. The extra 18% of the gross taken up by Valve versus EGS could be used to put more resources into the actual game.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        EGS charges 12%. That’s what makes the market leader the bad guy.

        At least Xbox provides a platform and Walmart and Gamestop provide physical products at physical locations.

        Steam doesn’t have those expenses. And they also have exclusive titles, just like EGS.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Walmart and GameStop provide a physical place, that’s it. The Developer sends them the physical product.

          Steam provides unlimited downloads, user forums, automatic updates, remote play, user reviews, Steam workshop etc…
          None of these other stores provide these things.

          Maybe Epic should charge more than 12% and invest that money in improving their client, or at least do that instead of wasting it on exclusivity deals. Then maybe I as a consumer will give a shit about Epic.