alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIranian Engineer Who Protested Forced Hijab Sentenced to 74 Lashesiranwire.comexternal-linkmessage-square205fedilinkarrow-up1638arrow-down111cross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.online
arrow-up1627arrow-down1external-linkIranian Engineer Who Protested Forced Hijab Sentenced to 74 Lashesiranwire.comalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square205fedilinkcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.online
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down10·edit-21 year agoAnd muslisms in france don’t understand the ban of hijabs in schools. This is why.
minus-squareNoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down12·1 year agoTalk about a non-sequitor.
minus-squareNoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down14·1 year agoYou’re basically saying France that banning hijab somehow has anything to do with not becoming a dictatorship.
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down5·1 year agoIt is banning a religious ideal imposed by an opressive reliegion. It has anything to do with not becoming a dictatorship. This is how a dictatorship look like: “Iranian Enginner who protested forced hijab sentenced to 74 lashes”
minus-squareafraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down4·1 year agoI was told that it was a ban on all religious symbols and it wasn’t a targetted attack on a minority group. Now you are saying it is targeted. Are we doing the “say the quite part loud” now?
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoWhen did I say it was targeted?
minus-squareafraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoYou implied it. "banning a religious ideal imposed by an opressive reliegion. "
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoThe ban applies to all women that use those clothes, doesn’t matter their religion. Happy?
minus-squareNoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down9·edit-21 year agoYou’re still not actually supporting that claim. I guess this is what it looks like when you haven’t reasoned your way into a position. By the way, there’s a reason democracies tend to value freedom of religion.
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down3·1 year agoIs anyone banning people from being Muslims? Let me know and I’ll go protest for them to the streets.
minus-squareNoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down8·1 year agoSeriously, this is the best you came up with? Technically being Muslim isn’t banned in China either. Preventing people from harmlessly practicing their religion is also against freedom of religion.
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·1 year ago Who is preventing Muslims to practice their religion? Enforcing a sexist, misogynistic, ancient ideal that women need to cover their body for men to not to be tempted is in no way “harmless”
minus-squarezikk_transport2@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
And muslisms in france don’t understand the ban of hijabs in schools. This is why.
Talk about a non-sequitor.
Explain?
You’re basically saying France that banning hijab somehow has anything to do with not becoming a dictatorship.
It is banning a religious ideal imposed by an opressive reliegion. It has anything to do with not becoming a dictatorship.
This is how a dictatorship look like: “Iranian Enginner who protested forced hijab sentenced to 74 lashes”
I was told that it was a ban on all religious symbols and it wasn’t a targetted attack on a minority group. Now you are saying it is targeted.
Are we doing the “say the quite part loud” now?
When did I say it was targeted?
You implied it. "banning a religious ideal imposed by an opressive reliegion. "
The ban applies to all women that use those clothes, doesn’t matter their religion. Happy?
You’re still not actually supporting that claim. I guess this is what it looks like when you haven’t reasoned your way into a position.
By the way, there’s a reason democracies tend to value freedom of religion.
Is anyone banning people from being Muslims? Let me know and I’ll go protest for them to the streets.
Seriously, this is the best you came up with? Technically being Muslim isn’t banned in China either. Preventing people from harmlessly practicing their religion is also against freedom of religion.
Who is preventing Muslims to practice their religion?
Enforcing a sexist, misogynistic, ancient ideal that women need to cover their body for men to not to be tempted is in no way “harmless”
deleted by creator