ruffsl@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 10 months agoBig projects are ditching TypeScript… wtf? - The Code Reportyoutube.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up199arrow-down143cross-posted to: typescript@programming.dev
arrow-up156arrow-down1external-linkBig projects are ditching TypeScript… wtf? - The Code Reportyoutube.comruffsl@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square46fedilinkcross-posted to: typescript@programming.dev
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-210 months agoUgh? Why shouldn’t it be the same code?
minus-squarescorpionix@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoBecause Browsers can’t run Typescript, they run JavaScript. That’s why the intermediate conversion step isneededd.
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-210 months agoBut your tests are running on the compiled code too. Nothing can be tested but handwritten assembly, with such approach
Ugh? Why shouldn’t it be the same code?
Because Browsers can’t run Typescript, they run JavaScript. That’s why the intermediate conversion step isneededd.
But your tests are running on the compiled code too. Nothing can be tested but handwritten assembly, with such approach