mrsgreenpotato@discuss.tchncs.de to Factorio@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoFriday Facts #375 - Qualityfactorio.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down12file-textcross-posted to: games@lemmy.worldgames@sh.itjust.worksgaming@beehaw.org
arrow-up172arrow-down1external-linkFriday Facts #375 - Qualityfactorio.commrsgreenpotato@discuss.tchncs.de to Factorio@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square16fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: games@lemmy.worldgames@sh.itjust.worksgaming@beehaw.org
minus-squareHereticalDoughnut@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agoSeems interesting to me. However, I agree with some others on the forums that the names for the quality levels are kinda dumb. Would prefer something like the crude, good, excellent, perfect, etc.
minus-squaremrsgreenpotato@discuss.tchncs.deOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoGood point, seems like they could still revisit the naming convention.
Seems interesting to me. However, I agree with some others on the forums that the names for the quality levels are kinda dumb. Would prefer something like the crude, good, excellent, perfect, etc.
Good point, seems like they could still revisit the naming convention.