• Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Those two examples are wildly different from eachother. One is a medical procedure involving theoretical children, and the other has real kids getting injured and killed.

    Edit: wanted to add that the medical procedure is always to prevent a major health issue when being funded by state taxes.

    • Flax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Whenever the israelis bomb the buildings, they don’t know for certain there are kids in there. They are just theoretical kids in the moment to them.

      • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        More like, Schrodinger’s kids. I genuinely hope you find peace and learn to not let being pro-birth justify letting others suffer and/or die. Red tape and bans kill when it comes to healthcare, without solving anything.

        • Flax
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          15 hours ago

          A successful abortion always has at least a 100% fatality rate.

          • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Why does that matter? If the fetus cannot survive outside the womb due to genetic defects, why would I care about that when I could care about the health of the mother?

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Oh, so the mother’s die every time?

            Even under your bad definition it’d be only 50-60% (accounting for the fact that some mothers do die)

            • Flax
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That’ll make it 200% if they did

              • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                You can’t have a higher than 100% death rate, that means more people died than were involved in what happened

                By reasonable definition that’s 1 death: the mother

                By your own poor definition it’s 2: mother and fetus

                So where are we getting extra from?