Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 6 days agoY'know what?slrpnk.netimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1205arrow-down16cross-posted to: noncredibledefense@lemmy.world
arrow-up1199arrow-down1imageY'know what?slrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: noncredibledefense@lemmy.world
minus-squarefeedum_sneedson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoAs an Englishman, I had no idea what the problem was. I used Google (an internet search-engine) to figure out what the post was about.
minus-squareAce0fBlades@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 days agoThese rifles typically have the magazines loaded in the back by the stock. This is called a bullpup design. The advantages of this are to have a shorter rifle end to end while maintaining the same length barrel.
minus-squarefeedum_sneedson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoThat’s what I was able to ascertain, I’m guessing it’s about accuracy in a smaller gun?
As an Englishman, I had no idea what the problem was. I used Google (an internet search-engine) to figure out what the post was about.
These rifles typically have the magazines loaded in the back by the stock. This is called a bullpup design. The advantages of this are to have a shorter rifle end to end while maintaining the same length barrel.
That’s what I was able to ascertain, I’m guessing it’s about accuracy in a smaller gun?
Correct-a-mundo!