• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    require an issue to be reproducible with flatpak,

    As a guy who worked in OS security, no fucking way will I be doing that.

    • fl42v@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So, basically, you make software that doesn’t work outside flatpak without patches, then start removed about how much those patches suck, then, instead of pretty much saying “we only support flapaks, stop bothering us with distro-related issues” on the issue page, you add even more stuff that needs to be patched out because “sesurity”? Makes perfect sense, ngl.