Summary

France’s Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor, its most powerful at 1,600 MW, was connected to the grid on December 21 after 17 years of construction plagued by delays and budget overruns.

The European Pressurized Reactor (EPR), designed to boost nuclear energy post-Chernobyl, is 12 years behind schedule and cost €13.2 billion, quadruple initial estimates.

President Macron hailed the launch as a key step for low-carbon energy and energy security.

Nuclear power, which supplies 60% of France’s electricity, is central to Macron’s plan for a “nuclear renaissance.”

  • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    When people fall off a rooftop, you don’t have to make an exclusion zone around it for hundreds of years.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think that’s the point here. OP is claiming that nuclear is overburdened by regulations, which normally protects people. But when they go wrong or aren’t followed, it changes the map.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          That OP is me. Yeah, you’re right. Some are required. The same for any other power source. Coal, for example, constantly sprays radioactive waste into the sky, and they aren’t burdened by it. Nuclear is singled out, and that’s because it’s a risk to existing industries. It isn’t so burdened out of actual need.

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s why I’m hoping for the smaller modular designs that can be certified and studied very well.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Both are good. Usually scale gives better efficiency, though nuclear is already so efficient that it isn’t strictly required. I’m in favor of moving forward with both, and we should be getting the government to support the development, at least by removing unnecessary barriers that are there just to prop up dirty energy a little longer.