2025 is the year I plan on reading Volumes 1-3 of Capital. I understand that Marxists.org has the Moore/Engels version, but most people seem to prefer the Fowkes translation in Penguin. Recently, there is the Reitter translation of Volume 1 that supposedly uses a later original German edition of Capital as the base than the widely beloved Fowkes translation, but I am not sure if anyone has any experience with it yet.

Which would you recommend for someone diving into Capital for the first time? I’d prefer a physical version (to take notes) but I am not too fussed if its an ebook, I’m not incapable of using a notebook or anything instead of direct annotation.

    • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      All 3 are accessible to me (especially if I sail the seven seas), I was just wondering what people here tend to prefer as I believe the general user here knows a good deal more than I do.

        • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Figured it would be rude to directly @ people, but I welcome their input if they choose to engage!

          As for the Chapo question, my best guess is that the activity of Hexbear is generally much higher, but your guess is as good as mine lol

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            I honestly wouldn’t worry too much which version you read. I read the first volume of Moore/Engels version and it was fine. I did find that it was a pretty tough read, particularly the first half. Marx spends a lot of time establishing the base of his argument, and explaining what the fundamentals of an economy are, what money represents, and so on. It’s all necessary stuff, but I did find it to be a bit of a slog. The second part of the book is much more engaging though, and you can really see how he nails a lot of the invariants of capitalism because it’s so relatable today. My biggest advice would be to be prepared to just take it slow, and make sure you’ve really digested each chapter before moving to the next one.

            • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              Thanks, appreciate the advice! If Hexbear does another reading group for 2025 I will probably take that opportunity to hold myself accountable with respect to keeping up with it, while pacing myself.

              I’ve heard that the first 3 chapters are especially dense, but once I digest those fully the rest should come more naturally.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                Yeah that tracks from my recollection. I do find the style Marx uses can be somewhat painful to follow because he’ll keep building up the argument to the point where you start losing track of the whole point being made, and you have to go back and reread earlier parts of the argument. He doesn’t bother breaking it up it small chunks you can digest individually.

            • The second part of the book is much more engaging though, and you can really see how he nails a lot of the invariants of capitalism because it’s so relatable today.

              Volume 2, on circulation? Honestly, that was the book I didn’t understand. What did you take away from that?

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Oh no, I just meant the second part of the first volume. Regarding circulation, my understanding was that capitalism requires a continuous, uninterrupted circulation process to realize surplus value in order to reproduce itself. However, this process contains inherent contradictions making it prone to crises due to the varying time it takes for capital to flow through its different phases of production, circulation, and consumption.

                Marx argues that surplus value, created in production, can only be realized through circulation. Capitalists must sell the commodities they produce to get back their initial investment and to make profit. The money must then reinvested to restart the cycle, allowing the system to reproduce itself.

                Since there is time and cost involved in commodities being transported, stored, and marketed, capital ends up being tied up and can’t generate new value during that period. Effectively, these costs reduce the overall surplus value that’s realized. Different forms of capital have different turnover times. Fixed capital such as machinery or buildings is invested for long periods, while circulating capital like raw materials and labor power turns over quickly. The disparity creates unevenness in the accumulation process.

                Discrepancies between production and consumption, changes in demand, difficulties in selling, and variations in turnover times can disrupt the flow of capital introducing instabilities. These disruptions can lead to overproduction or devaluation of capital that culminate in recurring economic crises.

                Capitalism seeks to overcome these problems either through optimization of supply chains or use of credit and financial systems to help accelerate the flow of capital. However, these solutions can also exacerbate the system’s inherent contradictions.

                The core argument, if I understand it correctly, is that smooth circulation of capital is necessary for the survival of the capitalist system. Yet, circulation itself a source of instability and crises, as the pursuit of profit constantly pushes against the limitations of time and the unpredictability of the market.

  • roux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t have a suggestion on which translation but I’d like to plug “Reading Capital With Comrades” on Spotify as a supplementary reading aid. That’s actually how I consumed the book(I haven’t personally read it) and the guy that does it did a really good job at explaining things. The only complaint is that he cites 3 versions for each quote, each time and it gets a bit annoying. I wish he’d have just gone with one source.

    • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Will keep that in mind, thanks! I want to take my time with it because at this point I feel that I am quite comfortable in the basics of Marxism-Leninism and feel that it’s the right time to take on Capital, so having other comrades supplementing my knowledge via reading aids will be a part of that.

      • roux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The way the podcast is set up is that you read a chapter, and then listed to that episode. I cheated and just listened but if you go the intended route, I think you will have an easy time, especially considering what all you’ve read already.

        The first three chapters are gonna seem really familiar to you most likely since it’s basically just “Wage Labor and Capital” and I think “Value, Price and Profit” but chapter 4 introduced the MCM and CMC formulas which is basically “money buys capital commodities and makes money” and capital commodities makes money and buys more capital commodities" respectively. The rest of the book basically builds on these formulas and the first 3 chapters iirc(it’s been like 2 years).

        E: C actually stands for commodity, not capital, woopsies!

        • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yep, I am already familiar with the overlying messages of Capital, but I really want to dig into Capital itself, hence the waffling about which translation to use.

            • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              From the digging around of Reddit, most people agree Fowkes over Moore/Engels, but the new Reitter translation could be better than both. If I can’t find a clear rec one way or the other with respect to Reitter, then I will likely default to Fowkes.

                • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Yep, hence my intention to read all 3 volumes (ignoring Volume 4 for now) at a steady pace in 2025, haha. Most works I have read up to this point have been no more than 300 pages, but I feel prepared and motivated. If I’m going to be spending a long time with the text, I figured I’d at least ask what a good consensus on translation is, haha.

  • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    don’t have anything to add regarding translations but on reading aids, the David Harvey lecture series from like 2007 is meant to be a really good companion. i’ve only gone through a few of them but have heard really good things from friends. I think he is easy to listen to and takes you through a great close reading of the texts explaining concepts and prompting good questions as he goes along. they can all be found on youtube, i think there is a newer series from 2019 as well, he has been teaching the text every year for a long time and knows it extremely well.

  • Cuervo@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I read the Ben Fowkes penguin edition. It’s good. Some of the footnotes are a bit… meta - where you have footnotes from Marx, BF and Engels. This version is my preference , as I like to hold the book, especially if I have to study something carefully.

    IMO it’s better than the Marxists.org copy because the online version contains errors. only minor typos, formatting issues and unclear footnotes but they are there. I do refer to that version and have skim read most of it because it’s handy to have an online, always-accessible, searchable version.

    but for closely studying, i would go with the physical penguin version if you can afford it and can get along with handwriting notes, etc (if you work better online, the Marxists.org version will be fine.)

    As for the reading order, you don’t have to read it from start to finish. Pick a later chapter that looks interesting and think about the general concepts that you already know about while you read it. . Once you see how Marx deploys his concepts in one of the…juicier chapters, you might find chapters 1-4 a lot more engaging. because you will know where Marx is going with them.

    (I would suggest then eventually re-reading the later chapter when you read from chapter 1 chronologically - you’ll be able to re-evaluate it knowing Marx’s notion of commodities in more depth and things will start to make a lot of sense).

      • Cuervo@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        you’re welcome. I’m thinking of taking a look at the reitter translation. if I can find the time, I’ll read it this year (assuming I’m not the only one who is treating 2025 basically to have started already-i don’t think I’ll get around to it in '24). I’ll make a post about it if I do

        likewise , let me know what you think if you go with that version or read it later ; there’s a strong chance that you’ll read it before me lol (my reading list is always far too ambitious).

        • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Haha, I have trimmed my theory “need to read” list to around 30 more works, 3 of which are Capital but others are around 30 minutes of reading, some are 10 hours, etc. I plan on making my way through it in 2025, though that will be difficult… and I still plan on reading more afterwards.

          Will let you know if I go with Reitter though!

  • roux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is also a book called “Marx’s Das Kapital for Beginners” by Michael Wayne that might be helpful. I haven’t read it though but just remembered it was in my library.