merridew to Enough Musk Spam@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoX “unfit” for banking because of complicity in Saudi spying, lawyers arguearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1199arrow-down14cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1195arrow-down1external-linkX “unfit” for banking because of complicity in Saudi spying, lawyers arguearstechnica.commerridew to Enough Musk Spam@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square17fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareriodoro1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year ago Would people do banking through Facebook or even TikTok? Definitely. Thats my point, they would but they shouldn’t. People are definitely dumb enough to trust twitter with their money. They bought NFTs for fucks sake.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoI am not a betting man and I can’t predict the future, but I would wager that fewer people would trust Twitter as a bank than would pay them $8 a month for a blue checkmark, which will probably be required to use it as a bank.
Thats my point, they would but they shouldn’t. People are definitely dumb enough to trust twitter with their money. They bought NFTs for fucks sake.
I am not a betting man and I can’t predict the future, but I would wager that fewer people would trust Twitter as a bank than would pay them $8 a month for a blue checkmark, which will probably be required to use it as a bank.