• Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    182
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because the US is controlled by corporations

    Asia for the most part doesn’t care

    Australia is run by right wing nut jobs

    New Zealand is quiet so they probably do do something like this but we haven’t heard about it.

    Japan is Japan. Civil rights isn’t really a thing.

    And China and Russia love invasion of privacy it’s basically the entire basis of their countries.

    • Ixoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well actshually… Australia used to be run by right-wing nutjobs. The current mob in power are centrist nut jobs.

      • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The power behind the throne in Australia is still right wing nut jobs and corporations

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like Australia and New Zealand is kind of like England and Scotland in that sense.

          • Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Australia is essentially just Texas out in a remote corner of the world. Just a bunch of mining and oil companies running a country.

            • Chocrates@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              So your telling me Capitalism is destroying the planet everywhere regardless of the nominal government “in charge”?

      • PickTheStick@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m really curious (as I’m not living there) what the difference is. Is it just their religious tendencies? Or is it their feelings towards the nebulous “other” that defines them?

        • Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In Australia there are two major political parties, Labor and Liberals.

          Liberals does not mean what it does in the US, they are the right wing party, who are in a coalition with the Nationals party which is even further right wing.

          Labor is now centre-right as they kept running on centre-left policies and losing.

          The defining difference between the parties on the domestic front are that Labor supports and Liberals oppose

          1. Social safety nets

          2. Universal medical care

          3. Taxation of corporations

          On a foreign policy front they parties are broadly aligned however their stance on how to deal (interact) with China is vastly different, where Labor engages the Liberals attack China endlessly which resulted in a trade war which we’re still feeling the effects of.

          This is a very shallow examination of Australia’s political landscape but I’m not a political commentator.

      • WiseMoth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I am generally curious what you mean by centrist nut jobs? The whole point of the centre is to be somewhere in the middle and therefore the best of both worlds that everyone has something in common with as far as I’m concerned

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no “best of both worlds” when one side wants you to be a fucking slave. Wake up, dummy.

            • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Best of both worlds” doesn’t literally mean expressing everything on a numeric scale and averaging it out.

              • 9point6@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, we know.

                What’s the best that should we take from the far right?

                It’s an ideological desert over there once you look past the race supremacy, inevitable oligarchy and people dying if they don’t spend enough of their time struggling to survive. It’s literally just psychopathic power grabbing when you really distill it down.

                If any of that sounds good to you, I’m not interested in the world you want.

                Support for centrism is either complete political ignorance, or looking at that desert and thinking “I think we need some of that shit over here”

                • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Nothing. And neither should we take anything from the far left. It’s the moderates that have good ideas.

                  • 9point6@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Okay, humour me then, I’m clearly the ignorant one here.

                    Let’s pretend that this centre which pulls from both sides is completely uninfluenced by the extremes somehow.

                    What’s good about the not-quite-so-right that’s unique compared against the far right then?

                    What’s good about the not-quite-so-left that’s unique from the far left?

                    Do these things marry up in a way that’s not entirely ideologically bankrupt in the dissonance required?

        • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well yes, but actually no. Greenland is part of Denmark, which is in the EU, but Greenland is not in the EU.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            But the Data Protection Authority is the same and they have quite similar laws, most likely completely compliant with EU regulations. Both because cultural connections as well as them wanting to position themselves as a location for internet infrastructure.

            Countries like Iceland straight-up implement GDPR because EEA. I’d say both could easily be convinced to become EU members by reforming the fisheries policy into something sane, both when it comes to size of quotas (the EU could pull an order of magnitude more fish out of the water if we’d let stocks recover to the levels from 100 years ago) and distribution of quotas – coasts should be considered (more) like mineral deposits: We’re not getting any Austrian silver either why are they getting our fish, if they want to fish they can buy quotas from a coastal state.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Africa is still developing so data privacy is the least of their concerns. They’re focusing on creating stable corruption free governments that don’t undergo a coup or civil war every 5 years, and having a hell of a time with that.

        • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Africa is an enormous continent, it contains 53 different countries and what you said is only true of a handful of them.

          I don’t blame you, I blame the eurocentric educational system and news media.

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          that don’t undergo a coup or civil war every 5 years, and having a hell of a time with that.

          If by “having a hell of a time with that” you mean “the US loves shutting down developing nations”, absolutely.

          • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is no evidence the US has been involved in the last several coups, we’ve been supporting efforts at fair democratic processes and development in Africa for years.

            • Gabu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Good joke. The US is literally AT ALL TIMES trying to destabilize any country that could potentially pose a problem to their hegemony. As recently as 2022 it has been PROVEN that US agencies tried (unsuccessfully) to undermine Brazilian democracy, as an example. (Before you try to change subjects - yes, Brazil is not in Africa. It’s just a concrete example you can’t dodge with argumentation).

    • abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would like to point the RWNJs finally got voted out in Oz last year (federal and most states). Of course Murdoch and co. are working hard to reverse that, but semi sane leadership is in place for at least a year or two more.

    • Ryumast3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      As with most things in the US, California has similar laws to the gdpr (though admittedly not as powerful), so a lot of websites are starting to change a bit in the US because of california.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      China and Russia are dictatorships meaning they do whatever the fucknthey like and if you don’t like it you might become suicidal.