• bob_lemon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I will argue that Witcher 3 did not have enough content for it’s own world. Don’t get me wrong, the content was great, but there’s large swathes of emptiness inbetween. The devs tried to fill it with map markers that got repetitive very quickly (hello, random floating barrels).

    IMO, downscaling the world to 75% size and reducing the amount of non-quest content would have made the game better.

    • bollybing@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The whole reason I burned out on W3 was trying to be completionist and doing all the map markers before moving to the next area.

      • Khrux@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Honestly I think these games need more points of interest that are not marked on the map whatsoever, and don’t matter towards 100% completion.

        I eventually went through the Witcher 3 post game and got every single marker but it was basically background work while I listened to audiobooks, I didn’t come across anything interesting for hours. However I do acknowledge that those markers aren’t necessary meant to be sought out, but stumbled upon.