You don’t think it matters that a news outlet is running cover for their ally? A news outlet that themselves forbid their journalists from using the word “genocide” in the context of Israel’s genocide of Palestinians until November 2024?
Sorry but I don’t understand the first question. The other thing yeah, it wasn’t good. Anyway I don’t particularly like The Guardian but what is misleading here? People were arrested because UK government kneel to the zionists, the prohibition to get close to the BBC it’s just a silly justification for the arrests.
It’s not that The Guardian buried a technical detail of the story, the protestors deliberately got close to the BBC offices, because they were protesting the BBC. The BBC is complicit in this genocide, together with The Guardian. The Guardian’s reporting is slightly uninformative in a way that shields the reader from knowing the subject’s opinion on The Guardian’s complicity.
You don’t think it matters that a news outlet is running cover for their ally? A news outlet that themselves forbid their journalists from using the word “genocide” in the context of Israel’s genocide of Palestinians until November 2024?
Sorry but I don’t understand the first question. The other thing yeah, it wasn’t good. Anyway I don’t particularly like The Guardian but what is misleading here? People were arrested because UK government kneel to the zionists, the prohibition to get close to the BBC it’s just a silly justification for the arrests.
It’s not that The Guardian buried a technical detail of the story, the protestors deliberately got close to the BBC offices, because they were protesting the BBC. The BBC is complicit in this genocide, together with The Guardian. The Guardian’s reporting is slightly uninformative in a way that shields the reader from knowing the subject’s opinion on The Guardian’s complicity.