• meep_launcher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    There was a 32 minute period from initial text to the first response, and then the whole thing was over by minute 3.

    That certainly didn’t kill an hour. That’s like 35 minutes. Something’s not right.

    I’d go so far as to say OP is a liar. I bald faced full lipped green eyed strong jawed curly haired liar who broke my heart and will do so again.

    • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I noticed that too but I think the meme is constructed by juxtaposing a twitter post making the claim about how much time it would kill onto a text of someone testing the claim on their friend, so the twitter person turns out to be wrong but no fault should be applied to the text convo.

      • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Screenshot of a text convo in the screenshot of a Twitter post in a post on Lemmy- I’m holding you to account reallykindasorta. This rests solely on your broad, muscular shoulders. Quite frankly there’s no way to wash your rugged yet tender hands of this mess, and I for one won’t stand for it.

        They told me the devil would be beautiful.

        • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I certainly perpetuated the myth by sharing it. In that case I’m going to defend it and say that this single text anecdote is an outlier and that, on average, this question would take an hour to resolve (including clarifications about weapons and such).

  • Phuntis@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    one of my favourite graphs ever dunno if it’s real but eh it’s funny

    love the difference on geese

    personally I’d say rat house cat and medium dog are my definite I’d win not even that difficult maybe maybe the big dog but I dunno the dog could win any of the others are a hard no I’d die

    • GooberEar@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      American male: I’m confident up to, but excluding the large dog. Now I’m sure there’s a good chance I could win against a large dog, but it’s not a big enough chance to call it “confident” and that’s the first animal on the list where I can see things going very poorly for me if I don’t handle the situation just right.

      With the eagle, I’d probably get hurt (badly) and regret it, but what’s the chance I’d lose the fight? I mean, their bones are fragile and once a wing is broken, it’s game over for them.

      Geese? We have Canada geese, amongst other species. They have a well-deserved reputation for their disagreeable personalities (especially when protecting their offspring). They can make you hurt if they wanted to, but an otherwise healthy adult human male can easily win in a fight with them as long as the human doesn’t lose his nerve.

      • Phuntis@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        we also have canada geese in the UK they’re very common here terrifying beasts can break an arm

    • Brosplosion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’d rather take on a goose than a cat/rat. Geese at least you can get a hold of easily.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Ahh I love this graph, true to the stereotypes as an American male I have spent way too long thinking about the different matchups. I think I could beat a chimpanzee, maybe… I’d have a huge weight advantage and that’s not to be laughed at. Although I think they are very strong for their weight… but humans have better endurance probably. I think once I see red and my killer instincts activate I’d wipe the floor with him.

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          i don’t even think it’s a stalemate most of the time, it’s very easy to avoid getting bitten honestly, i think an able bodied human could win outright like 6/10 times if they’re extremely careful and have a stick.

          And the other 4/10 times are stalemates so…

    • johan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      This is great. I would never fuck with a goose! Although I think if you know how to grab it by the neck you’ll be OK.

      Do you have the source of the graph by the way? I would love to share it.

      • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I’m team “All animals must receive a pet”

        I wouldn’t fight a goose, but only lord knows how much would I fight to give the goose my headpats and to have it really tame around me.

        I would bring my A-Game and armed to the teeth with peanuts, grapes, banana and pellets!

        And this fight will be legendary taking many day and nights (actually, scratch the idea of taking nights. A healthy goose must have a healthy and undisturbed sleep)

    • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Americans are also some of the loudest, over-confident, self-absorbed, entitled people on the planet. Of course they believe they can take on any animal.

      My apologies go out to the dozen other Americans who are cool.

        • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          No problem, there’s plenty shit about Germans too! Bunch of conservative assholes that are afraid of change and are fucking weird in general. Especially the people in East Germany and Bavaria. Bunch of cunts is what they are. Except for the dozen of people that are cool of course.

    • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Have Americans even seen what a goose does?

      You’d have a hand around its neck, doing twirls for a shotput throw, and yeah, the goose goes like twenty-five meters back into the lake, and that’s fine.

      But with a sinking realization as the goose fucks off, it stole your wallet.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I guess Americans just have more experience in actually fighting those overgrown turkeys. Actually turkeys have spurs so they’re a bit more of a threat to a human adult than geese are. I’d rather tussle with a goose than a wild Tom turkey.

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is a family legend about an amorous goose. I don’t know it well enough to tell it properly though, I wasn’t there when it happened. But I do not understand the Statesian confidence in goose warfare.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    I could totally take a T-Rex, and if you don’t believe me bring one here and I’ll fight it!

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    The idea that a horse could prepare is kinda whack. What is it gonna do? Get to an open field?

    • blackmagic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think you could kill a horse in an open field without a long distance weapon. It’s a flight animal, if you did any significant damage to it, you’d never come close enough to get it to fight you. Enclosed spaces, that’s a different story (you still lose that, it’s a horse).

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nah, we min maxed for this already. I mean not me, I’m terrible at running. But I imagine if you go back far enough one of my ancestors was good enough at long distance running that we could eventually chase that horsey down and bang it in the head with a rock when it’s all tired out.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            If that ancestor also can track it down, maybe.

            I mean, considering one of our ancestors had to at some point catch one to ride, I’m sure they could manage.

            You… probably not.

            Probably is gracious of you, considering I haven’t been hunting in like 20 years.

        • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          I imagine they’ll still have thrown or slung something at a distance. Why risk the horse in its desperation giving you a botched chest surgery if you can outrange it?

            • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Trapping and feeding goes a long way too.

              The saying “You catch more flies with honey than vinegar” isn’t for nothing.

              And don’t underestimate the humans ability to pet the fuck out of everything!

              Animals love receiving pets and we, humans, love petting animals.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think the more important question is, can a horse prep? Like does it even understand the concept of prepping? I think if you could somehow tell a horse that a week from now it would have to fight a human it probably wouldn’t do anything to prepare.

    • blackmagic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah

      We have worked with hundreds of sloths over the years, (both wild and human-reared) and they can all inflict serious injuries if scared or irritated. We have seen a sloth bite through a human hand leaving a hole big enough that you could look through.

      In addition to their seriously sharp teeth, sloths are astonishingly strong. Due to their specialized muscle structure, their muscles are pound for pound stronger than a human’s. Despite their small size, sloths are 3x stronger than the average person. Meaning that if you are up against an angry sloth who wants to bite you, chances are the sloth will be the winner of that wrestling match.

      When they reach independence (at the age of about 18 months), even the most gentle of hand-reared sloths just do not want to be handled any longer.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Mom raised abandoned mountain lion cubs. Let’s just say I now have no illusions as to my skill fighting an angry possum.

    tl;dr: A 90lb. cat with eat your fucking lunch. Even without claws.

  • Didros@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Any dude who thinks he can beat a horse is just so wrong. I don’t think anything bigger than a bug is possible. I would feel too bad lol

    • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The thing is, horses have a pretty fatal design flaw. If you can manage to take out one of its leg, the bout is won.

      Of course, that misses the fact that those legs will be actively focused on kicking you, but with prep time you could probably find a way to get the horse to trip and break a leg.

    • Kacarott@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Depends what counts as winning. If leaving the arena counts as forfeit then I reckon I could beat a horse cus I don’t think a horse has any desire to be there

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you get prep time surely its easy? What is the horse going to do, I can just make a few spears and set a stick on fire to wave in its face to scare it.

      • Didros@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Imagine doing it. Stabbing a weapon into the panicking animal while trying to not get kicked. The blood from the wound makes the weapon slippery and hard to hold…

        Could you really? You make it sound so easy, like the people who have not taken a life tend to.

        • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I don’t think a horse would choose melee if it can run, and if you prepare for range (multiple javelins), you have an advantage. A gokd hit on the more sensitive parts of the legs can knock it down, and while it keeps running you could collect your projectiles and keep trying. Persistence hunting can wear it out, even if it’s faster. Once it’s on the ground, finishing it wouldn’t be as dangerous any more if you stick it from outside kicking range.

          If it does fight up close, yeah, that’d be terrifying, but the range advantage of the spear would give you an edge still. Physically, I think I could pull it off.

          Emotionally, I’m pretty sure I couldn’t handle it. I’d go down, paralysed at the thought of hurting it.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean a horse is certainly bigger than anything I have had to kill, I will give you that.

          But I went with spear because it’s typically the weapon of choice against cavalry, it gives you distance reducing the chance you get kicked. You can also place multiple spears around you to protect your location, or make traps and scare it into running into them.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    With or without tools? Tools change the equation big time. The ability of humans (and other monkeys) to throw stuff is probably the closest thing to fucking bullshit sorcery the animal kingdom has ever seen. Even just being able to throw a kinda heavy rock competently can massively level the playing field between a person and a mid-size predator (obviously bears won’t give two shits).

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    I could definitely beat the piss out of a salmon, especially if we were brawling out-of-water. A sheep too. I might get a little hurt, but I think I’d be evenly matched with an angry sheep.

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would say unarmed unprepared combat I could do a coyote. I would be super fucked up but I think I could take one.

    • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      See the problem I have with this is that sure, you could take a coyote one-on-one. When is that situation going to happen though? Coyotes typically hunt in duos at minimum. Maybe you’re able to get your hands around the first, but you’re not going to be able to finish the fight before the second attacks from your blind spot.

      A lot of people judge their ability to win in a fight based on their 1v1 matchup, when realistically you should base it on how many you can expect to face at oncem

      • Majorllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean this whole thought experiment is based on hypotheticals in the first place. I never go anywhere completely unarmed and with my knife that I always carry I could absolutely kill many coyotes.

        Many people also conceal carry which would probably change the matchup to something much larger like a wild cat. I know handgun calibers generally only serve to piss off large game like bears and moose so it would probably top out somewhere around a mountain lion if we are allowing what some of us normally daily carry.

    • Rose Thorne(She/Her)@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Their bites aren’t as bad as you might think. They can fuck you up, but they rely on pretty quick attacks, so the risk is more in repeated strikes(from what we’ve seen with the limited coyote attacks that happen).

      Don’t recommend going for a straight-on brawl, but if you can get behind one, you might have a chance. Bonus points, they’re naturally pretty disinclined to fight a human unless given no other options, so you might be able to slip behind at a point?

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I heard of a grandma taking a bobcat once, so maybe that?

      The biggest problem is that most animals will never fight to the death. I could take multiple coyotes if I just need to scare them off. I could take a bear or mountain lion if all I need to do is not die.

      Checkmate liberals! 😁

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        I could take a bear

        If the bear actively wanted you dead? It would also hugely depend on the bear. A sunbear? Maybe. A polarbear could kill me just by sitting on me.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Animals only have so much motion to kill you. Polar bears have few food options and aren’t as scared of humans, while a lone black bear is more scared of you than you are of it. If you threaten any bear’s cubs, they’ll end you. However, apex predators rarely fight in the wild unless they have strong motive. They’ll often claim and cede territory without fighting directly.

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            “take in a fight” assumes both sides will be fighting though, not just stumbling upon eachother.

            If a small sunbear wants to actively fight me, they’re like 30 kilos. I feel like have a nonzero chance against one. Not very much beyond zero though, because it’s got claws the size of my fingers