Signature /= footer

Resist

  • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    MAGA voters couldn’t identify a pronoun in high school. How are they supposed to figure it out now?

  • Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Doesn’t go far enough, remove pronouns from the email body too.

    To it may concern. Notice did not complete task before deadline. Please can provide update? Look forward to reply.

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Small government regulating pronouns in worker’s email signatures.

    Regulations For Thee but Not for Me

  • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Does that mean no-one can call him ‘President’ Trump or ‘Mr’ President any more?

  • MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    For the life of me, I can’t understand why they care about someone’s sexual orientation or their pronoun.

    I ran the numbers on sex changes and it’s like .001 of the population. It’s a non-issue.

    The real issues are homelessness, inequality, Internet privacy, poisons in our food and workers’ rights…

    Not fucking pronouns.

    • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      They don’t care. The tactic is to have a minority that you can blame for all the bad things.

      100 years ago it was the jews secretly running the world, today it’s the evil trans people and immigrants conspiring to destroy The West™.

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      For the life of me, I can’t understand why they care about someone’s sexual orientation or their pronoun.

      They don’t. It’s classic divide and conquer tactics to package up the general population into nice bite-sized chunks that they can destroy individually with minimal resistance from the others. Exact same shit is how the Nazis rose to power.

    • Fluid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Got to distract from the real issues somehow. Gotta keep that wealth extraction and concentrating system of exploitation alive. Can’t have the slave rising up to overthrow their masters again…

    • ynazuma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The same can be said for all those years wasted shaming people into using gender neutral language and adding pronouns to communications

      Maybe we should not waste any time on this

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Sorry to all the Blakes, Dylans, Ashleys, Francises, Shannons, Frankies, Charlies, Rorys, Blairs, Leslies, Angels, Billies, Sams, Kellys, Danas, Harleys, Adins, Caseys, and all the other non-binary/gender neutral names that I can’t think of right now.

    -signed a person with a non-binary name

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Even for gender cishet people a Dylan, Casey or Sam might be a “he/him” or “she/her” and its just not obvious from the name.

        • ynazuma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          49
          ·
          10 hours ago

          So?

          Does that mean we all have to waste our time with pronouns?

          I can think of only one time I thought a female was a male from their name. It was not a problem. The name was Noel

          Seems like the name argument is no argument at all

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            50 minutes ago

            we, our, and I are all pronouns. Yes, we pretty much need to use pronouns.

          • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            So?

            Does that mean all have to waste time with pronouns?

            Can think of only one time thought a female was a male from name. Was not a problem. The name was Noel

            Seems like the name argument is no argument at all

            Sounds good ma’am. Have a great one

    • Probius@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Don’t you know that adding your pronouns to an email costs an entire 6-10 bytes? There are children starving in Africa and you’re wasting your bytes on pronouns! Shame on you.

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This is so stupid. I know plenty of cishet people who include their pronouns in their sig because they have a gender neutral name.

    • threshold_dweller@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I, too, dislike being employed.

      But seriously most people will not risk their livelihood for it. It is almost guaranteed to end up in court like so many other of their bullshit policies.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    And yet again, the Tangerine Palpatine is focusing on stupid shit.

    Farmers unable to gather their harvest? The working and middle classes being squeezed into oblivion? Grocery prices skyrocketing? Unknown drones taunting our military bases? Military helicopters colliding with commercial jets?

    Nah, none of that stuff matters! Instead we just focus on fucking pronouns in emails!

    What an absolute fucking joke.

    Edit: fixed a typo.

    • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Nah, none of that stuff matters!

      No, not to him, that’s the point.

      How much more deliberate in their oppressing and exploiting do those in power need to be before people stop expecting any different?

      They’re there to serve themselves, not society

  • h_ramus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The communist leader of northern Venezuela is mandating how to conduct your business, how to write, how to speak.

    Party of small government, rule of law and free markets.

  • Tower@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Legal disclaimers often have pronouns, right?

    “The information contained in this email message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately notify me by replying to this message and then delete this email from your system.”

    Malicious compliance it and replace all of the pronouns: “The information contained in this email message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. If the recipient is not an intended recipient of this email, the recipient is hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If the recipient received this email in error, please immediately notify John Doe by replying to this message and then delete this email from the recipient’s system.”

    Fuck 'em. I’m sure with a bit of work they could come up with some stuff that renders it nearly unreadable.

    • Malgas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Um, I didn’t see where it said to replace pronouns with anything, only to remove them. So the correct verbiage would clearly be:

      The information contained in this email message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. If are not an intended recipient of this email, are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If received this email in error, please immediately notify by replying to this message and then delete this email from system.