• Gutek8134@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    My Java classes at uni:

    Here’s a piece of code that does nothing. Make it do nothing, but in compliance with this design pattern.

    When I say it did nothing, I mean it had literally empty function bodies.

    • boletus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Yeah that’s object oriented programming and interfaces. It’s shit to teach people without a practical example but it’s a completely passable way to do OOP in industry, you start by writing interfaces to structure your program and fill in the implementation later.

      Now, is it a good practice? Probably not, imo software design is impossible to get right without iteration, but people still use this method… good to understand why it sucks

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Mine were actually useful, gotta respect my uni for that. The only bits we didn’t manually program ourselves were the driver and the tomcat server, near the end of the semester we were writing our own Reflections to properly guess the object type from a database query.

    • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      So what? You also learn math with exercises that ‘do nothing’. If it bothers you so much add some print statements to the function bodies.

      • Gutek8134@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I actually did do that. My point was to present a situation where you basically do nothing in higher education, which is not to say you don’t do/learn anything at all.