Big oof.

    • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you imagine some future historian finding these sorts of papers?

      Like, “Oh shit, they knew this was happening. Knew what these conditions did to people, and it was going on for long enough that they were able to published research papers on the conditions before, you know, DOING anything about it.”

      • Magician [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lead was used extensively in Roman aqueducts from about 500 BC to 300 AD. Julius Caesar’s engineer, Vitruvius, reported, “water is much more wholesome from earthenware pipes than from lead pipes. For it seems to be made injurious by lead, because white lead is produced by it, and this is said to be harmful to the human body.”

        Good thing we didn’t knowingly build infrastructure around lead in the US!

  • emizeko [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    When one individual inflicts bodily injury upon another such that death results, we call the deed manslaughter; when the assailant knew in advance that the injury would be fatal, we call his deed murder. But when society places hundreds of proletarians in such a position that they inevitably meet a too early and an unnatural death, one which is quite as much a death by violence as that by the sword or bullet; when it deprives thousands of the necessaries of life, places them under conditions in which they cannot live – forces them, through the strong arm of the law, to remain in such conditions until that death ensues which is the inevitable consequence – knows that these thousands of victims must perish, and yet permits these conditions to remain, its deed is murder just as surely as the deed of the single individual; disguised, malicious murder, murder against which none can defend himself, which does not seem what it is, because no man sees the murderer, because the death of the victim seems a natural one, since the offence is more one of omission than of commission. But murder it remains. I have now to prove that society in England daily and hourly commits what the working-men’s organs, with perfect correctness, characterise as social murder, that it has placed the workers under conditions in which they can neither retain health nor live long; that it undermines the vital force of these workers gradually, little by little, and so hurries them to the grave before their time. I have further to prove that society knows how injurious such conditions are to the health and the life of the workers, and yet does nothing to improve these conditions. That it knows the consequences of its deeds; that its act is, therefore, not mere manslaughter, but murder, I shall have proved, when I cite official documents, reports of Parliament and of the Government, in substantiation of my charge.

    —Friedrich Engels, Condition of the Working Class in England, 1845